Although several scientists have recently studied overland flow detachment, the methodology of measurement has not yet been properly discussed. This study compares several different methods. A flume was constructed to measure soil detachment. Remoulded soils were tested in order to minimize the effects of sediment load and deposition on the soil sample surface by way of a suitable methodology. The soil sample sizes were established on the basis that erosion must scour the entire surface of the soil target. Incipient detachment rate, determined through the use of several methods, was compared with the condition for incipient entrainment and the method which showed the best agreement with Shields' criterion was selected. Two data sets collected following the selected procedure and a different one were compared. While the general trends deducible from the two data sets were similar, the difference in intensity of the detachment rate was close to a factor 10 showing that measurements of flow detachment rate are sensitive to the procedure applied. The sensitivity of the proposed methodology to various factors that can influence detachment was examined using remoulded and undisturbed soil samples. Particularly, differences in initial soil moisture conditions and soil surface characteristics due to the combined effects of various types of crops and applied raindrop kinetic energy caused differences in soil detachability by overland flow. Furthermore, soil sampling in different periods of the year resulted in variations in soil detachment indicating a seasonal trend in soil detachability.

Detachment of soil particles by shallow flow: sampling methodology and observations / R. Ciampalini; D. Torri. - In: CATENA. - ISSN 0341-8162. - STAMPA. - 32:(1998), pp. 37-53. [10.1016/S0341-8162(97)00050-7]

Detachment of soil particles by shallow flow: sampling methodology and observations

CIAMPALINI, ROSSANO
;
1998

Abstract

Although several scientists have recently studied overland flow detachment, the methodology of measurement has not yet been properly discussed. This study compares several different methods. A flume was constructed to measure soil detachment. Remoulded soils were tested in order to minimize the effects of sediment load and deposition on the soil sample surface by way of a suitable methodology. The soil sample sizes were established on the basis that erosion must scour the entire surface of the soil target. Incipient detachment rate, determined through the use of several methods, was compared with the condition for incipient entrainment and the method which showed the best agreement with Shields' criterion was selected. Two data sets collected following the selected procedure and a different one were compared. While the general trends deducible from the two data sets were similar, the difference in intensity of the detachment rate was close to a factor 10 showing that measurements of flow detachment rate are sensitive to the procedure applied. The sensitivity of the proposed methodology to various factors that can influence detachment was examined using remoulded and undisturbed soil samples. Particularly, differences in initial soil moisture conditions and soil surface characteristics due to the combined effects of various types of crops and applied raindrop kinetic energy caused differences in soil detachability by overland flow. Furthermore, soil sampling in different periods of the year resulted in variations in soil detachment indicating a seasonal trend in soil detachability.
1998
32
37
53
R. Ciampalini; D. Torri
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ciampalini et al CATENA 1998.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 255.87 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
255.87 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/356038
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 36
social impact