A numerical framework for full-bridge aeroelasticity is presented, based on unsteady cross-sectional load models and on the finite element modeling of the structure. A frequency-domain approach based on aeroelastic derivatives and nonlinear complex eigenvalue analysis is compared to its equivalent time-domain counterpart based on indicial functions and direct integration of the equations of motion. A version of the time-domain load model consistent with the quasi-steady limit behavior is developed and a procedure for the numerical identification of the indicial functions from measured aeroelastic derivatives is presented. The aeroelastic stability analysis is chosen as benchmark. A numerical example is offered where the equivalency of the two approaches is proved for a full-bridge model. Advantages and disadvantages of the two techniques are discussed.
Numerical Modelling of Full-Bridge Aeroelasticity: Frequency- and Time-Domain Methods / C.Borri;L.Salvatori. - STAMPA. - (2006), pp. 111-122. (Intervento presentato al convegno IN-VENTO-2006 tenutosi a Pescara nel 18-21 giugno 2006).
Numerical Modelling of Full-Bridge Aeroelasticity: Frequency- and Time-Domain Methods
BORRI, CLAUDIO;SALVATORI, LUCA
2006
Abstract
A numerical framework for full-bridge aeroelasticity is presented, based on unsteady cross-sectional load models and on the finite element modeling of the structure. A frequency-domain approach based on aeroelastic derivatives and nonlinear complex eigenvalue analysis is compared to its equivalent time-domain counterpart based on indicial functions and direct integration of the equations of motion. A version of the time-domain load model consistent with the quasi-steady limit behavior is developed and a procedure for the numerical identification of the indicial functions from measured aeroelastic derivatives is presented. The aeroelastic stability analysis is chosen as benchmark. A numerical example is offered where the equivalency of the two approaches is proved for a full-bridge model. Advantages and disadvantages of the two techniques are discussed.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2006-BS-INVENTO.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Altro
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
280.6 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
280.6 kB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.