The prevalence of BRAF, NRAS, and p16CDKN2A mutations during melanoma progression remains inconclusive. We investigated the prevalence and distribution of mutations in these genes in different melanoma tissues. In all, 291 tumor tissues from 132 patients with melanoma were screened. Paired samples of primary melanomas (n 102) and synchronous or asynchronous metastases from the same patients (n 165) were included. Tissue samples underwent mutation analysis (automated DNA sequencing). Secondary lesions included lymph nodes (n 84), and skin (n 36), visceral (n 25), and brain (n 44) sites. BRAF/NRAS mutations were identified in 58% of primary melanomas (43% BRAF; 15% NRAS); 62% in lymph nodes, 61% subcutaneous, 56% visceral, and 70% in brain sites. Mutations were observed in 63% of metastases (48% BRAF; 15% NRAS), a nonsignificant increase in mutation frequency after progression from primary melanoma. Of the paired samples, lymph nodes (93% consistency) and visceral metastases (96% consistency) presented a highly similar distribution of BRAF/NRAS mutations versus primary melanomas, with a significantly less consistent pattern in brain (80%) and skin metastases (75%). This suggests that independent subclones are generated in some patients. p16CDKN2A mutations were identified in 7% and 14% of primary melanomas and metastases, with a low consistency (31%) between secondary and primary tumor samples. In the era of targeted therapies, assessment of the spectrum and distribution of alterations in molecular targets among patients with melanoma is needed. Our findings about the prevalence of BRAF/NRAS/p16CDKN2A mutations in paired tumor lesions from patients with melanoma may be useful in the management of this disease.

BRAF/NRAS Mutation Frequencies among Primary Tumors and Metastases in Patients with Melanoma / M. Colombino; M. Capone; A. Lissia; A. Cossu; C. Rubino; V. De Giorgi; D. Massi; E. Fonsatti; S. Staibano; O. Nappi; E. Pagani; M. Casula; A. Manca; M.C. Sini; R. Franco; G. Botti; C. Caracò; N. Mozzillo; P.A. Ascierto; G. Palmieri. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0732-183X. - ELETTRONICO. - 30:(2012), pp. 2522-2529.

BRAF/NRAS Mutation Frequencies among Primary Tumors and Metastases in Patients with Melanoma

MASSI, DANIELA;
2012

Abstract

The prevalence of BRAF, NRAS, and p16CDKN2A mutations during melanoma progression remains inconclusive. We investigated the prevalence and distribution of mutations in these genes in different melanoma tissues. In all, 291 tumor tissues from 132 patients with melanoma were screened. Paired samples of primary melanomas (n 102) and synchronous or asynchronous metastases from the same patients (n 165) were included. Tissue samples underwent mutation analysis (automated DNA sequencing). Secondary lesions included lymph nodes (n 84), and skin (n 36), visceral (n 25), and brain (n 44) sites. BRAF/NRAS mutations were identified in 58% of primary melanomas (43% BRAF; 15% NRAS); 62% in lymph nodes, 61% subcutaneous, 56% visceral, and 70% in brain sites. Mutations were observed in 63% of metastases (48% BRAF; 15% NRAS), a nonsignificant increase in mutation frequency after progression from primary melanoma. Of the paired samples, lymph nodes (93% consistency) and visceral metastases (96% consistency) presented a highly similar distribution of BRAF/NRAS mutations versus primary melanomas, with a significantly less consistent pattern in brain (80%) and skin metastases (75%). This suggests that independent subclones are generated in some patients. p16CDKN2A mutations were identified in 7% and 14% of primary melanomas and metastases, with a low consistency (31%) between secondary and primary tumor samples. In the era of targeted therapies, assessment of the spectrum and distribution of alterations in molecular targets among patients with melanoma is needed. Our findings about the prevalence of BRAF/NRAS/p16CDKN2A mutations in paired tumor lesions from patients with melanoma may be useful in the management of this disease.
2012
30
2522
2529
M. Colombino; M. Capone; A. Lissia; A. Cossu; C. Rubino; V. De Giorgi; D. Massi; E. Fonsatti; S. Staibano; O. Nappi; E. Pagani; M. Casula; A. Manca; M.C. Sini; R. Franco; G. Botti; C. Caracò; N. Mozzillo; P.A. Ascierto; G. Palmieri
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Colombino 2012.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 120.62 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
120.62 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/605074
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 395
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 382
social impact