Aims. — To monitor acute brain injury in the neurological intensive care unit (NICU), we used EEG and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) in combination to achieve more accuracy in detecting brain function deterioration. Methods. — Sixty-eight patients (head trauma and intracranial hemorrhage; GCS < 9) were mon- itored with continuous EEG-SEP and intracranial pressure monitoring (ICP). Results. — Fifty-five patients were considered ‘‘stable’’ or improving, considering the GCS and CT scan: in this group, SEP didn’t show significant changes. Thirteen patients showed neurolog- ical deteriorations and, in all patients, cortical SEP showed significant alterations (amplitude decrease > 50% often till complete disappearance). SEP deterioration anticipated ICP increase in 30%, was contemporary in 38%, and followed ICP increase in 23%. Considering SEP and ICP in relation to clinical course, all patients but one with ICP less than 20 mmHg were stable, while the three patients with ICP greater than 40 mmHg all died. Among the 26 patients with ICP of 20—40 mmHg, 17 were stable, while nine showed clinical and neurophysiological deterioration. Thus, there is a range of ICP values (20—40 mmHg) were ICP is scarcely indicative of clinical deterioration, rather it is the SEP changes that identify brain function deterioration. Therefore, SEP have a twofold interest with respect to ICP: their changes can precede an ICP increase and they can constitute a complementary tool to interpret ICP trends. It has been very important o associate SEP and EEG: about 60% of our patients were deeply sedated and, because of their relative insensitivity to anesthetics, only SEP allowed us to monitor brain damage evolution when EEG was scarcely valuable. Conclusions. — We observed 3% of nonconvulsive status epilepticus compared to 18% of neuro- logical deterioration. If the aim of neurophysiological monitoring is to ‘‘detect and protect’’, it may not be limited to detecting seizures, rather it should be able to identify brain deterioration, so we propose the combined monitoring of EEG with SEP.

Continuous EEG-SEP monitoring in severe braininjury / A. Amantinia; S. Fossi; A. Grippo; P. Innocenti; A. Amadori; L. Bucciardini; C. Cossu; C. Nardini; S. Scarpelli; V. Roma; F. Pinto. - In: CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY. - ISSN 1388-2457. - STAMPA. - 39:(2009), pp. 85-93.

Continuous EEG-SEP monitoring in severe braininjury

PINTO, FRANCESCO
2009

Abstract

Aims. — To monitor acute brain injury in the neurological intensive care unit (NICU), we used EEG and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) in combination to achieve more accuracy in detecting brain function deterioration. Methods. — Sixty-eight patients (head trauma and intracranial hemorrhage; GCS < 9) were mon- itored with continuous EEG-SEP and intracranial pressure monitoring (ICP). Results. — Fifty-five patients were considered ‘‘stable’’ or improving, considering the GCS and CT scan: in this group, SEP didn’t show significant changes. Thirteen patients showed neurolog- ical deteriorations and, in all patients, cortical SEP showed significant alterations (amplitude decrease > 50% often till complete disappearance). SEP deterioration anticipated ICP increase in 30%, was contemporary in 38%, and followed ICP increase in 23%. Considering SEP and ICP in relation to clinical course, all patients but one with ICP less than 20 mmHg were stable, while the three patients with ICP greater than 40 mmHg all died. Among the 26 patients with ICP of 20—40 mmHg, 17 were stable, while nine showed clinical and neurophysiological deterioration. Thus, there is a range of ICP values (20—40 mmHg) were ICP is scarcely indicative of clinical deterioration, rather it is the SEP changes that identify brain function deterioration. Therefore, SEP have a twofold interest with respect to ICP: their changes can precede an ICP increase and they can constitute a complementary tool to interpret ICP trends. It has been very important o associate SEP and EEG: about 60% of our patients were deeply sedated and, because of their relative insensitivity to anesthetics, only SEP allowed us to monitor brain damage evolution when EEG was scarcely valuable. Conclusions. — We observed 3% of nonconvulsive status epilepticus compared to 18% of neuro- logical deterioration. If the aim of neurophysiological monitoring is to ‘‘detect and protect’’, it may not be limited to detecting seizures, rather it should be able to identify brain deterioration, so we propose the combined monitoring of EEG with SEP.
2009
39
85
93
A. Amantinia; S. Fossi; A. Grippo; P. Innocenti; A. Amadori; L. Bucciardini; C. Cossu; C. Nardini; S. Scarpelli; V. Roma; F. Pinto
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
amantiniFossi.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 1.26 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.26 MB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia
amantiniFossi.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 455.02 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
455.02 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/621194
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact