The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of timing on Mandibular Anterior Repositioning Appliance (MARA) and fixed appliance treatment of Class II malocclusion in a prospective clinical trial. The treated sample consisted of 51 consecutively treated patients at prepubertal (n = 21), pubertal (n = 15), and postpubertal (n = 15) stages of development. Control groups for the three treated groups were generated from growth data of untreated Class II subjects. Lateral cephalograms were digitized and superimposed via cephalometric software at T1 (pre-treatment) and T2 (after comprehensive treatment). The T1–T2 changes in the treated groups were compared to those in their corresponding control groups with Mann–Whitney tests with Bonferroni correction. Mandibular elongation was greater at the pubertal stage (Co–Gn +2.6 mm, with respect to controls). Headgear effect on the maxilla was greater in the pre-peak sample (Co–A −1.9 mm, with respect to controls). Dentoalveolar compensations (proclination of lower incisors, extrusion and mesialization of lower molars, and reduction in the overbite) were significant in the pre-peak and post-peak groups. Optimal timing for Class II treatment with MARA appliance is at the pubertal growth spurt, with enhanced mandibular skeletal changes and minimal dentoalveolar compensations.
Treatment timing of MARA and fixed appliance therapy of Class II malocclusion / L.T. Huanca Ghislanzoni; T. Baccetti; D. Toll; E. Defraia; J.A. McNamara; L. Franchi. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS. - ISSN 1460-2210. - STAMPA. - 35:(2013), pp. 394-400. [10.1093/ejo/cjs023]
Treatment timing of MARA and fixed appliance therapy of Class II malocclusion
BACCETTI, TIZIANO;DEFRAIA, EFISIO;FRANCHI, LORENZO
2013
Abstract
The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of timing on Mandibular Anterior Repositioning Appliance (MARA) and fixed appliance treatment of Class II malocclusion in a prospective clinical trial. The treated sample consisted of 51 consecutively treated patients at prepubertal (n = 21), pubertal (n = 15), and postpubertal (n = 15) stages of development. Control groups for the three treated groups were generated from growth data of untreated Class II subjects. Lateral cephalograms were digitized and superimposed via cephalometric software at T1 (pre-treatment) and T2 (after comprehensive treatment). The T1–T2 changes in the treated groups were compared to those in their corresponding control groups with Mann–Whitney tests with Bonferroni correction. Mandibular elongation was greater at the pubertal stage (Co–Gn +2.6 mm, with respect to controls). Headgear effect on the maxilla was greater in the pre-peak sample (Co–A −1.9 mm, with respect to controls). Dentoalveolar compensations (proclination of lower incisors, extrusion and mesialization of lower molars, and reduction in the overbite) were significant in the pre-peak and post-peak groups. Optimal timing for Class II treatment with MARA appliance is at the pubertal growth spurt, with enhanced mandibular skeletal changes and minimal dentoalveolar compensations.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Eur J Orthod-2012-Huanca Ghislanzoni-ejo_cjs023.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Altro
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
460.45 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
460.45 kB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.