Aim of the study: A new edition of the TNM was recently released that includes modifications for the staging system of kidney cancers. Specifically, T2 cancers were COMUNICAZIONI subclassified into T2a and T2b (≤10 vs >10 cm), tumors with renal vein involvement or perinephric fat involvement were classified as T3a cancers, and those with adrenal involvement were classified as T4 cancers. The purpose of the study was to validate the recently released edition of the TNM staging system for primary tumor classification in kidney cancer. Material and methods: Multicenter retrospective study, including 5339 patients treated in 16 academic Italian centers. Intervention. Radical or partial nephrectomy. Measurements. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models addressed cancer-specific survival (CSS) after surgery. Results: 1897 patients (35.5%) were classified as pT1a, 1453 (27%) as pT1b, 437 (8%) as pT2a, 153 (3%) as pT2b, 1059 (20%) as pT3a, 117 (2%) as pT3b, 26 (0.5%) as pT3c, and 197 (4%) as pT4. At a median follow-up of 42 mo, 786 (15%) had died of disease. In univariable analysis, patients with pT2b and pT3a tumors had similar CSS, as did patients with pT3c and pT4 tumors. Moreover, both pT3a and pT3b stages included patients with heterogeneous outcomes. In multivariable analysis, the novel classification of the primary tumor was a powerful independent predictor of CSS (p for trend <0.0001). However, the substratification of pT1 tumors did not retain an independent predictive role. The major limitations of the study are retrospective design, lack of central pathological review, and low number of patients included in some substages. Conclusion: The recently released seventh edition of the primary tumor staging system for kidney tumors was a powerful predictor of CSS. However, some of the substages identified by the classification had overlapping prognosis, and other substages included patients with heterogeneous outcomes. The few modifications included in this edition may have not resolved the most critical issues in the previous version.

VALIDATION OF PRIMARY RENAL CANCER CLASSIFICATION, ACCORDING TO THE NEW TNM STAGING SYSTEM / G. Novara; G.Martignoni;M. Brunelli;W. Artibani; G.Martorana;A. Antonelli; A. Simonato; S. Cosciani Cunico; A. Minervini; A. Lapini; S. Serni; L. Nicola; S. Siracusano; A. Volpe; F. Montorsi; V. Ficarra. - STAMPA. - Atti 83° Congresso SIU:(2010), pp. 94-95. (Intervento presentato al convegno 83° Congresso SIU tenutosi a Milano nel 17-20 ottobre).

VALIDATION OF PRIMARY RENAL CANCER CLASSIFICATION, ACCORDING TO THE NEW TNM STAGING SYSTEM

MINERVINI, ANDREA;SERNI, SERGIO;
2010

Abstract

Aim of the study: A new edition of the TNM was recently released that includes modifications for the staging system of kidney cancers. Specifically, T2 cancers were COMUNICAZIONI subclassified into T2a and T2b (≤10 vs >10 cm), tumors with renal vein involvement or perinephric fat involvement were classified as T3a cancers, and those with adrenal involvement were classified as T4 cancers. The purpose of the study was to validate the recently released edition of the TNM staging system for primary tumor classification in kidney cancer. Material and methods: Multicenter retrospective study, including 5339 patients treated in 16 academic Italian centers. Intervention. Radical or partial nephrectomy. Measurements. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models addressed cancer-specific survival (CSS) after surgery. Results: 1897 patients (35.5%) were classified as pT1a, 1453 (27%) as pT1b, 437 (8%) as pT2a, 153 (3%) as pT2b, 1059 (20%) as pT3a, 117 (2%) as pT3b, 26 (0.5%) as pT3c, and 197 (4%) as pT4. At a median follow-up of 42 mo, 786 (15%) had died of disease. In univariable analysis, patients with pT2b and pT3a tumors had similar CSS, as did patients with pT3c and pT4 tumors. Moreover, both pT3a and pT3b stages included patients with heterogeneous outcomes. In multivariable analysis, the novel classification of the primary tumor was a powerful independent predictor of CSS (p for trend <0.0001). However, the substratification of pT1 tumors did not retain an independent predictive role. The major limitations of the study are retrospective design, lack of central pathological review, and low number of patients included in some substages. Conclusion: The recently released seventh edition of the primary tumor staging system for kidney tumors was a powerful predictor of CSS. However, some of the substages identified by the classification had overlapping prognosis, and other substages included patients with heterogeneous outcomes. The few modifications included in this edition may have not resolved the most critical issues in the previous version.
2010
Atti 83° Congresso SIU
83° Congresso SIU
Milano
G. Novara; G.Martignoni;M. Brunelli;W. Artibani; G.Martorana;A. Antonelli; A. Simonato; S. Cosciani Cunico; A. Minervini; A. Lapini; S. Serni; L. Nicola; S. Siracusano; A. Volpe; F. Montorsi; V. Ficarra
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
C 87 -10.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 1.79 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.79 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/677927
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact