Impact of one or two visits strategy on hypertension burden estimation in HYDY, a population-based cross-sectional study: implications for healthcare resource allocation decision making.

Context.The prevalence of hypertension in developing countries is coming closer to values found in developed countries. However, surveys usually rely on readings taken at a single visit, the option to implement the diagnosis on readings taken at multiple visits, being limited by costs. Objective.To estimate more accurately the magnitude and extent of the resource that should be allocated to the prevention of hypertension. Design.Population-based cross-sectional survey with triplicate blood pressure readings taken on two separate home-visits. Setting.Rural and urban locations in three areas of Yemen (capital, inland, and coast). Participants.A nationally representative sample of the Yemen population aged 15 to 69 years (5063 men and 5179 women), with an overall response rate of 92% in urban and 94% in rural locations. Main outcome measure.Hypertension diagnosed as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg and/or self-reported use of antihypertensive drugs. Results.Hypertension prevalence (age-standardized to the WHO world population 2001) based on fulfilling the same criteria on both visits (11.3%:95%Cl 10.7-11.9),was 35% lower than estimation based on the first visit (17.3%:16.5-18.0). Advanced age, blood glucose ≥7 mmol/L, or proteinuria ≥1+ at dipstick test at visit one, were significant predictors of confirmation at visit two. The 959 participants found to be hypertensive at visit one or at visit two only and thus excluded from the final diagnosis, had a rate of proteinuria (5.0%;3.8-6.5) comparable to rates of the general population (6.1%; 5.6-6.6), and of subjects normotensive at both visits (5.6%;5.1-6.2). Only 1.9% of Yemen population classified at high or very high CV risk at visit one moved to average, low, or moderate CV risk categories after two visits. Conclusions.Hypertension prevalence based on readings obtained after two visits is 35% lower than estimation based on the first visit, subjects were excluded from final diagnosis belonging to low CV risk classes.