Impacts of nonindigenous crayfishes on ecosystem services exemplify the mixture of positive and negative effects of intentionally introduced species. Global introductions for aquaculture and ornamental purposes have begun to homogenize naturally disjunct global distributions of crayfish families. Negative impacts include the loss of provisioning (e.g., reductions in ed- ible native species, reproductive interference or hybridization with native crayfishes), regulatory (e.g., lethal disease spread, increased costs to agricul- ture and water management), supporting (e.g., large changes in ecological communities), and cultural (e.g., loss of festivals celebrating native crayfish) services. Where quantification of impacts exists (e.g., Procambarus clarkii and Pacifastacus leniusculus in Europe), regulations now prohibit introduction and spread of crayfishes, indicating that losses of ecosystem services have out- weighed gains. Recent research advances such as predicting invasiveness, predicting spread, improved detection and control, and bioeconomic analy- sis to increase cost effectiveness of management could be employed to reduce future losses of ecosystem services.

Global introductions of crayfishes: Evaluating the impact of species invasions on ecosystem services / D.M. LODGE; A. DEINES; F. GHERARDI; D.C.J. YEO; T. ARCELLA; A.K. BALDRIDGE; M.A. BARNES; W.L. CHADDERTON; J.L. FEDER; C.A. GANTZ; G.W. HOWARD; C.L. JERDE; B.W. PETERS; J.A. PETERS; L.W. SARGENT; C.R. TURNER; M.E. WITTMANN; Y. ZENG. - In: ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS. - ISSN 1543-592X. - STAMPA. - 43:(2012), pp. 449-472. [10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-111511-103919]

Global introductions of crayfishes: Evaluating the impact of species invasions on ecosystem services.

GHERARDI, FRANCESCA;
2012

Abstract

Impacts of nonindigenous crayfishes on ecosystem services exemplify the mixture of positive and negative effects of intentionally introduced species. Global introductions for aquaculture and ornamental purposes have begun to homogenize naturally disjunct global distributions of crayfish families. Negative impacts include the loss of provisioning (e.g., reductions in ed- ible native species, reproductive interference or hybridization with native crayfishes), regulatory (e.g., lethal disease spread, increased costs to agricul- ture and water management), supporting (e.g., large changes in ecological communities), and cultural (e.g., loss of festivals celebrating native crayfish) services. Where quantification of impacts exists (e.g., Procambarus clarkii and Pacifastacus leniusculus in Europe), regulations now prohibit introduction and spread of crayfishes, indicating that losses of ecosystem services have out- weighed gains. Recent research advances such as predicting invasiveness, predicting spread, improved detection and control, and bioeconomic analy- sis to increase cost effectiveness of management could be employed to reduce future losses of ecosystem services.
2012
43
449
472
D.M. LODGE; A. DEINES; F. GHERARDI; D.C.J. YEO; T. ARCELLA; A.K. BALDRIDGE; M.A. BARNES; W.L. CHADDERTON; J.L. FEDER; C.A. GANTZ; G.W. HOWARD; C.L. JE...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
LodgeEtAl_AREES2012.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Altro
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 542.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
542.91 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/773422
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 231
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 216
social impact