The continued globalization of manufacturing and service delivery has led to a concomitant globalization of the engineering profession. Engineers increasingly engage in international projects, including service on multinational teams at different points around the globe, collaborating on a common project through real-time, electronic communication. Effective collaboration requires not only the ability of participants to communicate in a common language, but also the assurance of a common level of technical understanding. Such issues are not trivial, given the global diversity of systems for educating engineers, for different goals in skills, for quality control of their education, and for regulating their professional practice. From the engineering education perspective, the accreditation and assessment of academic programmes is vital in order to maintain the quality and the status of engineering graduates, and hence the technical workforce. Results of a survey of the relevant literature and observations indicate that various accreditation models have been developed regionally, as well as internationally but most of these models seem to be non-uniform, too complex, non-transparent and, moreover, difficult in their application. This leads to confusion and growing concerns about the mutual recognition and global mobility of the engineering profession. As a result, there is an urgent need for a systematic and shared global model of engineering accreditation that can be used to assess global professional skills and attributes of engineering graduates. The aim of the current paper is double. While on the one hand it presents the added value of the EUR-ACE accreditation system as a European best practice example to encourage the mobility of engineering graduates, on the other one it presents a survey on the graduates’ opinion on the level of training in the different technical and non-technical areas, comparing the teaching profile with the actual needs of the professional working environments. The survey was carried out in August 2012 by the International Relations Office of the School of Engineering (University of Florence) as preliminary activity to the EUR-ACE accreditation of two curricula.

Focusing the Gap Between Teaching Profile and Professional Skills / Claudio Borri; Giampaolo Manfrida; Marcantonio Catelani; Elisa Guberti; Michele Betti. - STAMPA. - 1:(2013), pp. 79-86. (Intervento presentato al convegno 1st ENAEE Conference: “EUR-ACE® – The European Quality Label for Engineering Degree Programmes – Experiences and Perspectives” tenutosi a Porto, Portugal nel 12-13 November 2012).

Focusing the Gap Between Teaching Profile and Professional Skills

BORRI, CLAUDIO;MANFRIDA, GIAMPAOLO;CATELANI, MARCANTONIO;BETTI, MICHELE
2013

Abstract

The continued globalization of manufacturing and service delivery has led to a concomitant globalization of the engineering profession. Engineers increasingly engage in international projects, including service on multinational teams at different points around the globe, collaborating on a common project through real-time, electronic communication. Effective collaboration requires not only the ability of participants to communicate in a common language, but also the assurance of a common level of technical understanding. Such issues are not trivial, given the global diversity of systems for educating engineers, for different goals in skills, for quality control of their education, and for regulating their professional practice. From the engineering education perspective, the accreditation and assessment of academic programmes is vital in order to maintain the quality and the status of engineering graduates, and hence the technical workforce. Results of a survey of the relevant literature and observations indicate that various accreditation models have been developed regionally, as well as internationally but most of these models seem to be non-uniform, too complex, non-transparent and, moreover, difficult in their application. This leads to confusion and growing concerns about the mutual recognition and global mobility of the engineering profession. As a result, there is an urgent need for a systematic and shared global model of engineering accreditation that can be used to assess global professional skills and attributes of engineering graduates. The aim of the current paper is double. While on the one hand it presents the added value of the EUR-ACE accreditation system as a European best practice example to encourage the mobility of engineering graduates, on the other one it presents a survey on the graduates’ opinion on the level of training in the different technical and non-technical areas, comparing the teaching profile with the actual needs of the professional working environments. The survey was carried out in August 2012 by the International Relations Office of the School of Engineering (University of Florence) as preliminary activity to the EUR-ACE accreditation of two curricula.
2013
1st ENAEE Conference Proceedings
1st ENAEE Conference: “EUR-ACE® – The European Quality Label for Engineering Degree Programmes – Experiences and Perspectives”
Porto, Portugal
12-13 November 2012
Claudio Borri; Giampaolo Manfrida; Marcantonio Catelani; Elisa Guberti; Michele Betti
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Pagine da 1st_ENAEE_Conference_Proceedings_2012.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 338.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
338.73 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/808877
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact