Let K be a convex body containing the origin. A measurable set G with positive Lebesgue measure is said to be uniformly K-dense if, for any fixed r > 0, the measure of G∩(x+rK) is constant when x varies on the boundary of G (here, x+rK denotes a translation of a dilation of K). We first prove that G must always be strictly convex and at least C1,1-regular; also, if K is centrally symmetric, K must be strictly convex, C1,1-regular and such that K = G−G up to homotheties; this implies in turn that G must be C2,1-regular. Then for N = 2, we prove that G is uniformly K-dense if and only if K and G are homothetic to the same ellipse. This result was already proven by Amar et al. in 2008 .However, our proof removes their regularity assumptions on K and G, and more importantly, it is susceptible to be generalized to higher dimension since, by the use of Minkowski’s inequality and an affine inequality, avoids the delicate computations of the higher-order terms in the Taylor expansion near r = 0 for the measure of G ∩ (x +r K) (needed in 2008).
Characterization of ellipses as uniformly dense sets with respect to a family of convex bodies / R. Magnanini; M. Marini. - In: ANNALI DI MATEMATICA PURA ED APPLICATA. - ISSN 0373-3114. - STAMPA. - 193:(2014), pp. 1383-1395. [10.1007/s10231-013-0334-x]
Characterization of ellipses as uniformly dense sets with respect to a family of convex bodies
MAGNANINI, ROLANDO;
2014
Abstract
Let K be a convex body containing the origin. A measurable set G with positive Lebesgue measure is said to be uniformly K-dense if, for any fixed r > 0, the measure of G∩(x+rK) is constant when x varies on the boundary of G (here, x+rK denotes a translation of a dilation of K). We first prove that G must always be strictly convex and at least C1,1-regular; also, if K is centrally symmetric, K must be strictly convex, C1,1-regular and such that K = G−G up to homotheties; this implies in turn that G must be C2,1-regular. Then for N = 2, we prove that G is uniformly K-dense if and only if K and G are homothetic to the same ellipse. This result was already proven by Amar et al. in 2008 .However, our proof removes their regularity assumptions on K and G, and more importantly, it is susceptible to be generalized to higher dimension since, by the use of Minkowski’s inequality and an affine inequality, avoids the delicate computations of the higher-order terms in the Taylor expansion near r = 0 for the measure of G ∩ (x +r K) (needed in 2008).File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
reprintAMPA2014.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Open Access
Dimensione
207.93 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
207.93 kB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
MagnaniniMariniArx1206.4238.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza:
Open Access
Dimensione
211.58 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
211.58 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.