The causal effect of a randomized job training program, the JOBS II study, on trainees’ depression is evaluated. Principal Stratification is used to deal with noncompliance to the assigned treatment. Due to the latent nature of the principal strata, strong structural assumptions are often invoked to iden- tify principal causal effects. Alternatively, distributional assumptions may be invoked using a model-based approach. These often lead to weakly identi- fied models with substantial regions of flatness in the posterior distribution of the causal effects. Information on multiple outcomes is routinely collected in practice, but is rarely used to improve inference. This article develops a Bayesian approach to exploit multivariate outcomes to sharpen inferences in weakly identified principal stratification models. We show that inference for the causal effect on depression is significantly improved by using the re- employment status as a secondary outcome in the JOBS II study. Simulation studies are also performed to illustrate the potential gains in the estimation of principal causal effects from jointly modeling more than one outcome. This approach can also be used to assess plausibility of structural assumptions and sensitivity to deviations from these structural assumptions. Two model check- ing procedures via posterior predictive checks are also discussed.
Exploiting multiple outcomes in Bayesian Principal Stratification Analysis with Application to the Evaluation of a Job Training Program / A. Mattei; F. Li; F. Mealli. - In: THE ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS. - ISSN 1932-6157. - STAMPA. - 7:(2013), pp. 2336-2360. [10.1214/13-AOAS674]
Exploiting multiple outcomes in Bayesian Principal Stratification Analysis with Application to the Evaluation of a Job Training Program
MATTEI, ALESSANDRA;MEALLI, FABRIZIA
2013
Abstract
The causal effect of a randomized job training program, the JOBS II study, on trainees’ depression is evaluated. Principal Stratification is used to deal with noncompliance to the assigned treatment. Due to the latent nature of the principal strata, strong structural assumptions are often invoked to iden- tify principal causal effects. Alternatively, distributional assumptions may be invoked using a model-based approach. These often lead to weakly identi- fied models with substantial regions of flatness in the posterior distribution of the causal effects. Information on multiple outcomes is routinely collected in practice, but is rarely used to improve inference. This article develops a Bayesian approach to exploit multivariate outcomes to sharpen inferences in weakly identified principal stratification models. We show that inference for the causal effect on depression is significantly improved by using the re- employment status as a secondary outcome in the JOBS II study. Simulation studies are also performed to illustrate the potential gains in the estimation of principal causal effects from jointly modeling more than one outcome. This approach can also be used to assess plausibility of structural assumptions and sensitivity to deviations from these structural assumptions. Two model check- ing procedures via posterior predictive checks are also discussed.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
MLM_AOAS674_2013.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
338.15 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
338.15 kB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.