This paper presents the results of unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) simulations of flow around a common bridge deck geometry. Computations are performed with a noncommercial unstructured flow solver using two-dimensional hybrid meshes with fine near-wall resolution. The influence of different simulation parameters (grid refinement, time-step size, turbulence modelling) is analyzed, in particular in order to obtain flow solutions independent of spatial and temporal discretization. Results given by a one-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence model and a two-equation explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model are compared. Despite the limits imposed by the URANS approach and the relatively inexpensive two-dimensional computations, satisfactory agreement is found with the experimentally measured forces and pressures. These simulations help to explain the discrepancy between the results of two wind-tunnel test campaigns and show the dramatic influence of non-perfectly sharp edges on the global flow field development. The capability of the numerical approach to capture complex Reynolds number effects is also discussed.

Unsteady RANS simulations of flow around a bridge section / Claudio Mannini; Ante Soda; Ralph Voss; Günter Schewe. - In: JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS. - ISSN 0167-6105. - STAMPA. - 98:(2010), pp. 742-753. [10.1016/j.jweia.2010.06.010]

Unsteady RANS simulations of flow around a bridge section

MANNINI, CLAUDIO;
2010

Abstract

This paper presents the results of unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) simulations of flow around a common bridge deck geometry. Computations are performed with a noncommercial unstructured flow solver using two-dimensional hybrid meshes with fine near-wall resolution. The influence of different simulation parameters (grid refinement, time-step size, turbulence modelling) is analyzed, in particular in order to obtain flow solutions independent of spatial and temporal discretization. Results given by a one-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence model and a two-equation explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model are compared. Despite the limits imposed by the URANS approach and the relatively inexpensive two-dimensional computations, satisfactory agreement is found with the experimentally measured forces and pressures. These simulations help to explain the discrepancy between the results of two wind-tunnel test campaigns and show the dramatic influence of non-perfectly sharp edges on the global flow field development. The capability of the numerical approach to capture complex Reynolds number effects is also discussed.
2010
98
742
753
Claudio Mannini; Ante Soda; Ralph Voss; Günter Schewe
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/819350
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 56
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 49
social impact