Engineers are increasingly engaged in international projects as a consequence of the growing worldwide globalization of both productions and services; they should be able to work on multinational teams all around the world, collaborating on a common project through real-time communication. Successful and effective collaboration requires not only the ability of engineers to communicate in a common language, but also the assurance of a common level of technical understanding. Such issues are not trivial, given the global diversity of systems for educating engineers, for different goals in skills, for quality control of their education, and for regulating their professional practice. Consequently from the engineering education perspective the accreditation and the assessment of academic programmes is critical issue in order to assure the quality and the status of engineering graduates, and hence the technical workforce. In this respect the Europe-based EUR-ACE system, started in 2007 and run now by ENAEE (European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education), represents an effective framework and accreditation system that provides a set of standards that identifies high quality engineering degree programmes in Europe and abroad [1] [2]. The paper, discussing the added value of the EUR-ACE accreditation system as a European best practice example, aims to present the TEMPUS project QUEECA (Quality of Engineering Education in Central Asia) launched at a kick-off meeting in Villa Vigoni (Menaggio, Italy) in November 2012, and led by the University of Florence, School of Engineering, under the leadership of Prof. Claudio Borri. The QUEECA project involves 4 (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan) out of 5 TEMPUS countries in Central Asia (CA) and aims at setting up and implementing a system of Quality Assurance (QA) of Engineering Education (EE) in CA countries through the creation of a network of National QA accreditation Agencies able to accredit engineering programmes and authorized by ENAEE to award the EUR-ACE quality. The accredited programmes must satisfy the same pre-requisites for the award of the EUR-ACE quality label, i.e. the EUR-ACE Framework Standards (EAFS) and the European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.

The Quality of Engineering Education in Central Asia. The TEMPUS QUEECA project / Claudio Borri; Elisa Guberti; Michele Betti. - (2013), pp. 138-138. (Intervento presentato al convegno Proceedings of the 41st SEFI Annual Conference 2013, Engineering Education Fast Forward 1973 > 2013 tenutosi a Leuven, Belgium nel 16-20 September 2013).

The Quality of Engineering Education in Central Asia. The TEMPUS QUEECA project

BORRI, CLAUDIO;BETTI, MICHELE
2013

Abstract

Engineers are increasingly engaged in international projects as a consequence of the growing worldwide globalization of both productions and services; they should be able to work on multinational teams all around the world, collaborating on a common project through real-time communication. Successful and effective collaboration requires not only the ability of engineers to communicate in a common language, but also the assurance of a common level of technical understanding. Such issues are not trivial, given the global diversity of systems for educating engineers, for different goals in skills, for quality control of their education, and for regulating their professional practice. Consequently from the engineering education perspective the accreditation and the assessment of academic programmes is critical issue in order to assure the quality and the status of engineering graduates, and hence the technical workforce. In this respect the Europe-based EUR-ACE system, started in 2007 and run now by ENAEE (European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education), represents an effective framework and accreditation system that provides a set of standards that identifies high quality engineering degree programmes in Europe and abroad [1] [2]. The paper, discussing the added value of the EUR-ACE accreditation system as a European best practice example, aims to present the TEMPUS project QUEECA (Quality of Engineering Education in Central Asia) launched at a kick-off meeting in Villa Vigoni (Menaggio, Italy) in November 2012, and led by the University of Florence, School of Engineering, under the leadership of Prof. Claudio Borri. The QUEECA project involves 4 (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan) out of 5 TEMPUS countries in Central Asia (CA) and aims at setting up and implementing a system of Quality Assurance (QA) of Engineering Education (EE) in CA countries through the creation of a network of National QA accreditation Agencies able to accredit engineering programmes and authorized by ENAEE to award the EUR-ACE quality. The accredited programmes must satisfy the same pre-requisites for the award of the EUR-ACE quality label, i.e. the EUR-ACE Framework Standards (EAFS) and the European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.
2013
Proceedings of the 41st SEFI Annual Conference 2013, Engineering Education Fast Forward 1973 > 2013
Proceedings of the 41st SEFI Annual Conference 2013, Engineering Education Fast Forward 1973 > 2013
Leuven, Belgium
16-20 September 2013
Claudio Borri; Elisa Guberti; Michele Betti
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
113.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 125.64 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
125.64 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/820816
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact