The everolimus-eluting stent (EES) performs better than the first generation drug-eluting stent. Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes treated invasively is associated with improved clinical outcome and decreased risk of stent thrombosis. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical outcome and degree of platelet aggregation inhibition of patients treated with EES for unprotected left main disease (ULMD) and receiving clopidogrel or prasugrel. Patients receiving an EES for ULMD and with low residual platelet reactivity on clopidogrel or prasugrel treatment were included in the analysis. The primary end point of the study was the composite of cardiac mortality and myocardial infarction at 1 year. The secondary end point was the degree of platelet aggregation inhibition as assessed by light transmittance aggregometry. From January 2009 to December 2011, 252 patients with low residual platelet reactivity on thienopyridine treatment were treated with EES for ULMD. Of these, 104 patients received clopidogrel and 148 received prasugrel. The primary end point rate was lower in the prasugrel group compared with clopidogrel group: 1.3% and 9.6%, respectively (p = 0.002). Residual platelet reactivity was less in the prasugrel group compared with clopidogrel group (adenosine diphosphate 10 μmol/L 37 ± 17% and 45 ± 15%, respectively, p <0.001). At multivariate analysis, prasugrel treatment was related to the primary end point (hazard ratio 0.17; 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.77, p = 0.022). In conclusion, in patients treated with EES for ULMD, prasugrel compared with clopidogrel is associated with increased platelet aggregation inhibition and a better clinical outcome.

Comparison of the Degree of Platelet Aggregation Inhibition With Prasugrel Versus Clopidogrel and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Unprotected Left Main Disease Treated With Everolimus-Eluting Stents / Migliorini A;Valenti R;Parodi G;Marcucci R;Abbate R;Carrabba N;Gensini GF;Antoniucci D. - In: THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 0002-9149. - STAMPA. - 112:(2013), pp. 1843-1848. [10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.08.009]

Comparison of the Degree of Platelet Aggregation Inhibition With Prasugrel Versus Clopidogrel and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Unprotected Left Main Disease Treated With Everolimus-Eluting Stents.

MARCUCCI, ROSSELLA;ABBATE, ROSANNA;GENSINI, GIAN FRANCO;
2013

Abstract

The everolimus-eluting stent (EES) performs better than the first generation drug-eluting stent. Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes treated invasively is associated with improved clinical outcome and decreased risk of stent thrombosis. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical outcome and degree of platelet aggregation inhibition of patients treated with EES for unprotected left main disease (ULMD) and receiving clopidogrel or prasugrel. Patients receiving an EES for ULMD and with low residual platelet reactivity on clopidogrel or prasugrel treatment were included in the analysis. The primary end point of the study was the composite of cardiac mortality and myocardial infarction at 1 year. The secondary end point was the degree of platelet aggregation inhibition as assessed by light transmittance aggregometry. From January 2009 to December 2011, 252 patients with low residual platelet reactivity on thienopyridine treatment were treated with EES for ULMD. Of these, 104 patients received clopidogrel and 148 received prasugrel. The primary end point rate was lower in the prasugrel group compared with clopidogrel group: 1.3% and 9.6%, respectively (p = 0.002). Residual platelet reactivity was less in the prasugrel group compared with clopidogrel group (adenosine diphosphate 10 μmol/L 37 ± 17% and 45 ± 15%, respectively, p <0.001). At multivariate analysis, prasugrel treatment was related to the primary end point (hazard ratio 0.17; 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.77, p = 0.022). In conclusion, in patients treated with EES for ULMD, prasugrel compared with clopidogrel is associated with increased platelet aggregation inhibition and a better clinical outcome.
2013
112
1843
1848
Migliorini A;Valenti R;Parodi G;Marcucci R;Abbate R;Carrabba N;Gensini GF;Antoniucci D
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
comparison.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 425.35 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
425.35 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/822210
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact