Bibliometric indexes are customary used in evaluating the impact of scientific research, even though it is very well known that in different research areas they may range in very different intervals. Sometimes, this is evident even within a single given field of investigation making very difficult (and inaccurate) the assessment of scientific papers. On the other hand, the problem can be recast in the same framework which has allowed to efficiently cope with the ordering of web-pages, i.e., to formulate the PageRank of Google. For this reason, we call such problem the PaperRank problem, here solved by using a similar approach to that employed by PageRank. The obtained solution, which is mathematically grounded, will be used to compare the usual heuristics of the number of citations with a new one here proposed. Some numerical tests show that the new heuristics is much more reliable than the currently used ones, based on the bare number of citations. Moreover, we show that our model improves on recently proposed ones.

Recent advances in bibliometric indexes and the PaperRank problem / P.Amodio; L.Brugnano.. - In: JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS. - ISSN 1879-1778. - STAMPA. - 267:(2014), pp. 182-194. [10.1016/j.cam.2014.02.018]

Recent advances in bibliometric indexes and the PaperRank problem

BRUGNANO, LUIGI
2014

Abstract

Bibliometric indexes are customary used in evaluating the impact of scientific research, even though it is very well known that in different research areas they may range in very different intervals. Sometimes, this is evident even within a single given field of investigation making very difficult (and inaccurate) the assessment of scientific papers. On the other hand, the problem can be recast in the same framework which has allowed to efficiently cope with the ordering of web-pages, i.e., to formulate the PageRank of Google. For this reason, we call such problem the PaperRank problem, here solved by using a similar approach to that employed by PageRank. The obtained solution, which is mathematically grounded, will be used to compare the usual heuristics of the number of citations with a new one here proposed. Some numerical tests show that the new heuristics is much more reliable than the currently used ones, based on the bare number of citations. Moreover, we show that our model improves on recently proposed ones.
2014
267
182
194
P.Amodio; L.Brugnano.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
CAM-D-13-00266R1-1.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Altro
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 9.67 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
9.67 MB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/838927
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact