Gai 4.88-93 explaines two in rem defendant’s satisdationes (iudicatum solvi and pro praede litis et vindiciarum) like one. Because the difference between formula petitoria and agere in rem per sponsionem is great, satisdationes iudicatum solvi and pro praede can not be the same. Paper proposes a new reconstruction of satisdatio pro praede litis and vindiciarum, not based, as usual, on cautio iudicatum solvi, but regarding duplione damni decisio of XII tab. 12.3 about praedes litis et vindiciarum in legis actio sacramenti in rem.
contributo allo studio della satisdatio pro praede litis et vindiciarum / Giovanni Gulina. - In: ANNALI DEL SEMINARIO GIURIDICO. - ISSN 1972-8441. - STAMPA. - 56:(2014), pp. 66-99.
contributo allo studio della satisdatio pro praede litis et vindiciarum
GULINA, GIOVANNI
2014
Abstract
Gai 4.88-93 explaines two in rem defendant’s satisdationes (iudicatum solvi and pro praede litis et vindiciarum) like one. Because the difference between formula petitoria and agere in rem per sponsionem is great, satisdationes iudicatum solvi and pro praede can not be the same. Paper proposes a new reconstruction of satisdatio pro praede litis and vindiciarum, not based, as usual, on cautio iudicatum solvi, but regarding duplione damni decisio of XII tab. 12.3 about praedes litis et vindiciarum in legis actio sacramenti in rem.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Gulina Giovanni.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Descrizione: File principale
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
448.5 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
448.5 kB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.