Drawing from the economics of two-sided markets, we provide suggestions for the definition of the relevant market in cases involving two-sided platforms, such as media outlets, online intermediaries, payment cards companies, and auction houses. We also discuss when a one-sided approach may be harmless and when instead it can potentially lead to a wrong decision. We then show that the current practice of market definition in two-sided markets is only in part consistent with the above suggestions. Divergence between our suggestions and practice is due to the failure to fully incorporate the lessons from the economic theory of two-sided markets, to the desire to be consistent with previous practice, and to the higher data requirements and the higher complexity of empirical analysis in cases involving two-sided platforms. In particular, competition authorities have failed to recognize the crucial difference between two-sided transaction and non-transaction markets and have been misled by the traditional argument that where there is no price, there is no market.

Market Definition in two-Sided Markets: Theory and Practice / Lapo filistrucchi; Damien Geradin; Eric van Damme; Pauline Affeldt. - In: JOURNAL OF COMPETITION LAW & ECONOMICS. - ISSN 1744-6414. - STAMPA. - 10:(2014), pp. 293-339.

Market Definition in two-Sided Markets: Theory and Practice

FILISTRUCCHI, LAPO;
2014

Abstract

Drawing from the economics of two-sided markets, we provide suggestions for the definition of the relevant market in cases involving two-sided platforms, such as media outlets, online intermediaries, payment cards companies, and auction houses. We also discuss when a one-sided approach may be harmless and when instead it can potentially lead to a wrong decision. We then show that the current practice of market definition in two-sided markets is only in part consistent with the above suggestions. Divergence between our suggestions and practice is due to the failure to fully incorporate the lessons from the economic theory of two-sided markets, to the desire to be consistent with previous practice, and to the higher data requirements and the higher complexity of empirical analysis in cases involving two-sided platforms. In particular, competition authorities have failed to recognize the crucial difference between two-sided transaction and non-transaction markets and have been misled by the traditional argument that where there is no price, there is no market.
2014
10
293
339
Lapo filistrucchi; Damien Geradin; Eric van Damme; Pauline Affeldt
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Jnl of Competition Law & Economics-2014-Filistrucchi-293-339.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Altro
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 438.71 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
438.71 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/868964
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 99
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 96
social impact