Aim: To determine the reliability of the cord blood gas analysis on the unclamped cord compared to the standard technique of sampling on double clamped cord. Study design: Prospective observational study conducted on 46 singleton neonates vaginally delivered at term. Matched pairs of umbilical artery and vein blood samples were collected from undamped cord within 90 s after birth and from the same cord after clamping, with the clamping occurring immediately after the first blood collection. A blood gas analysis was performed on each collected sample. Outcome measures: Arterial and venous blood samples were analyzed for pH, PO2, pCO(2), SaO(2), hemoglobin concentration (ctHb) and base excess (BE). The values were compared between the two groups (clamped vs unclamped) using a Wilcoxon test. Results: No significant difference was found in pH, PO2, pCO(2), SaO(2) and ctHb values on arterial blood between unclamped and clamped cord. The only significant difference was related to BE (p < 0.001). For the venous blood, the values of pH, PO2, pCO(2) were comparable between unclamped and clamped cord, while the values of SaO(2), ctHb and BE were significantly different (p < 0.05). Conclusion: No significant difference was found in almost all the arterial blood gas parameters and in the main venous blood gas parameters between unclamped and clamped cord. Sampling of cord blood for gas analysis may be performed on the unclamped cord right after birth without reducing the accuracy of the analysis. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Blood gas values in clamped and unclamped umbilical cord at birth / Di Tommaso M;Seravalli V;Martini I;La Torre P;Dani C. - In: EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. - ISSN 0378-3782. - ELETTRONICO. - 90:(2014), pp. 523-525. [10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.03.010]

Blood gas values in clamped and unclamped umbilical cord at birth.

DI TOMMASO, MARIAROSARIA;SERAVALLI, VIOLA;DANI, CARLO;
2014

Abstract

Aim: To determine the reliability of the cord blood gas analysis on the unclamped cord compared to the standard technique of sampling on double clamped cord. Study design: Prospective observational study conducted on 46 singleton neonates vaginally delivered at term. Matched pairs of umbilical artery and vein blood samples were collected from undamped cord within 90 s after birth and from the same cord after clamping, with the clamping occurring immediately after the first blood collection. A blood gas analysis was performed on each collected sample. Outcome measures: Arterial and venous blood samples were analyzed for pH, PO2, pCO(2), SaO(2), hemoglobin concentration (ctHb) and base excess (BE). The values were compared between the two groups (clamped vs unclamped) using a Wilcoxon test. Results: No significant difference was found in pH, PO2, pCO(2), SaO(2) and ctHb values on arterial blood between unclamped and clamped cord. The only significant difference was related to BE (p < 0.001). For the venous blood, the values of pH, PO2, pCO(2) were comparable between unclamped and clamped cord, while the values of SaO(2), ctHb and BE were significantly different (p < 0.05). Conclusion: No significant difference was found in almost all the arterial blood gas parameters and in the main venous blood gas parameters between unclamped and clamped cord. Sampling of cord blood for gas analysis may be performed on the unclamped cord right after birth without reducing the accuracy of the analysis. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
2014
90
523
525
Di Tommaso M;Seravalli V;Martini I;La Torre P;Dani C
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Blood gas values in clamped and unclamped umbilical cord at birth 2014.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 169.43 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
169.43 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/874519
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact