Although in the last years technology innovation in healthcare brought big improvements in care level and patient quality of life, hospital complexity and management cost became higher. For this reason, necessity of planning for medical equipment procurement within hospitals is getting more and more important in order to sustainable provide appropriate technology for both routine activity and innovative procedures. In order to support hospital decision makers for technology procurement planning, an expert model was designed as reported in the following paper. It combines the most widely used approaches for technology evaluation by taking into consideration Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Medical Equipment Replacement Model (MERM). The designing phases include a first definition of prioritization algorithms, then the weighting process through experts' interviews and a final step for the model validation that included both statistical testing and comparison with real decisions. In conclusion, the designed model was able to provide a semi-automated tool that through the use of multidisciplinary information is able to prioritize different requests of technology acquisition in hospitals. Validation outcomes improved the model accuracy and created different “user profiles” according to the specific needs of decision makers.

Hospital-based expert model for health technology procurement planning in hospitals / R. Miniati;G. Cecconi;F. Frosini;F. Dori;J. Regolini;E. Iadanza;G. B. Gentili. - ELETTRONICO. - (2014), pp. 3504-3507. (Intervento presentato al convegno Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE tenutosi a Chicago, USA nel 2014) [10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944378].

Hospital-based expert model for health technology procurement planning in hospitals

MINIATI, ROBERTO;FROSINI, FRANCESCO;DORI, FABRIZIO;IADANZA, ERNESTO;
2014

Abstract

Although in the last years technology innovation in healthcare brought big improvements in care level and patient quality of life, hospital complexity and management cost became higher. For this reason, necessity of planning for medical equipment procurement within hospitals is getting more and more important in order to sustainable provide appropriate technology for both routine activity and innovative procedures. In order to support hospital decision makers for technology procurement planning, an expert model was designed as reported in the following paper. It combines the most widely used approaches for technology evaluation by taking into consideration Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Medical Equipment Replacement Model (MERM). The designing phases include a first definition of prioritization algorithms, then the weighting process through experts' interviews and a final step for the model validation that included both statistical testing and comparison with real decisions. In conclusion, the designed model was able to provide a semi-automated tool that through the use of multidisciplinary information is able to prioritize different requests of technology acquisition in hospitals. Validation outcomes improved the model accuracy and created different “user profiles” according to the specific needs of decision makers.
2014
2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2014
Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE
Chicago, USA
2014
R. Miniati;G. Cecconi;F. Frosini;F. Dori;J. Regolini;E. Iadanza;G. B. Gentili
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
IeeeEmbc_TRM_final.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 265.19 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
265.19 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/954373
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact