This study aims at investigating the value relevance of research and development (R&D) expenses reported under International Accounting Standard (IAS) 38. Using a sample of Italian listed firms for the period 2006-2012, we divide firm-year observations into two groups: firms capitalising R&D and firms expensing these costs in the income statement. In addition, we isolate R&D expensed by capitalisers firms. Results show that R&D costs expensed by capitalisers firms are value relevant, while this relation does not hold for expensers firms. In addition, capitalised costs are not related to market value either. According to the literature, these results can be due to the discretion given to the management in a) assessing future economic benefits so as to capitalise R&D expenses b) defining the difference between “research” and “development”. Our results contribute to the extant literature in the following ways. First, our results are particularly interesting for preparers, since they are informed about the economic consequence of R&D accounting policy choices. Second, we report a lack of information in most of the annual reports we examined, which constitutes an input for Standard Setters and market authorities. In the end, we conclude that implementation and enforcement regarding the reporting of R&D expenses under IAS 38 in Italy is far from being complete.

La value relevance delle spese di ricerca e sviluppo nelle società quotate italiane / Biagioni Roberto, Liberatore Giovanni, Francesco Mazzi. - In: RIVISTA DEI DOTTORI COMMERCIALISTI. - ISSN 0485-2281. - STAMPA. - 66:(2015), pp. 1-26.

La value relevance delle spese di ricerca e sviluppo nelle società quotate italiane

Liberatore Giovanni;Francesco Mazzi
2015

Abstract

This study aims at investigating the value relevance of research and development (R&D) expenses reported under International Accounting Standard (IAS) 38. Using a sample of Italian listed firms for the period 2006-2012, we divide firm-year observations into two groups: firms capitalising R&D and firms expensing these costs in the income statement. In addition, we isolate R&D expensed by capitalisers firms. Results show that R&D costs expensed by capitalisers firms are value relevant, while this relation does not hold for expensers firms. In addition, capitalised costs are not related to market value either. According to the literature, these results can be due to the discretion given to the management in a) assessing future economic benefits so as to capitalise R&D expenses b) defining the difference between “research” and “development”. Our results contribute to the extant literature in the following ways. First, our results are particularly interesting for preparers, since they are informed about the economic consequence of R&D accounting policy choices. Second, we report a lack of information in most of the annual reports we examined, which constitutes an input for Standard Setters and market authorities. In the end, we conclude that implementation and enforcement regarding the reporting of R&D expenses under IAS 38 in Italy is far from being complete.
2015
66
1
26
Biagioni Roberto, Liberatore Giovanni, Francesco Mazzi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2015_RdC_BiagioniLiberatoreMazzi.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 139.33 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
139.33 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/998630
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact