The aim of this paper is a direct comparison between: 1) a double-ridged horn antenna; 2) the same doubleridged horn filled with sawdust; 3) a bow-tie antenna operating in (approximately) the same band (0.5 GHz 1.5 GHz). The three antennas have been simulated and experimentally tested. The best performances in terms of capability to detect a target behind a 40 cm wall have been obtained with the horn antenna filled with sawdust
Comparison between Horn and Bow-tie Antennas for Through-the-Wall Applications / massimiliano pieraccini; lapo miccinesi; neda rojhani. - ELETTRONICO. - (2018), pp. 0-0. (Intervento presentato al convegno 2018 IEEE Conference on Antenna Measurements & Applications (CAMA)) [10.1109/CAMA.2018.8530531].
Comparison between Horn and Bow-tie Antennas for Through-the-Wall Applications
massimiliano pieraccini;lapo miccinesi;neda rojhani
2018
Abstract
The aim of this paper is a direct comparison between: 1) a double-ridged horn antenna; 2) the same doubleridged horn filled with sawdust; 3) a bow-tie antenna operating in (approximately) the same band (0.5 GHz 1.5 GHz). The three antennas have been simulated and experimentally tested. The best performances in terms of capability to detect a target behind a 40 cm wall have been obtained with the horn antenna filled with sawdust
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PID5368957.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
401.75 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
401.75 kB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
