Abstract Background Grain milling might be the oldest manufacturing process in the world, and many techniques are currently used in the food industry. The two predominant methods used in wheat milling are stone milling and roller milling. The selected technique significantly influences flour quality, dough rheological properties, and bread characteristics. Choosing the most suitable method is essential; therefore, here we summarise the advantages and disadvantages of each technique and suggest specific improvement strategies. Scope and approach The first aim is to summarise current knowledge regarding the effects of stone milling and roller milling on wheat flour quality, dough rheology, and bread characteristics. The second aim is to propose specific strategies to improve the two techniques. Key Findings and Conclusions This review highlights the importance of selecting the most suitable technique. Stone milling has a few, clear advantages. These include: ease of use and the simplicity of the system; higher concentrations of macroelements, microelements, and polyphenols in flour; increased whole wheat bread volume; and popularity with consumers. Roller milling, on the other hand, also has advantages. These include: greater efficiency and flexibility; less heat generation; and better dough rheological performance. This review has not declared a “winner”, as both techniques have advantages and disadvantages. The optimal milling system is a function of the aim to be achieved, bearing in mind business needs and product demand.

Stone milling versus roller milling: A systematic review of the effects on wheat flour quality, dough rheology, and bread characteristics / alessio cappelli, noemi oliva, enrico cini. - In: TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 0924-2244. - ELETTRONICO. - 97:(2020), pp. 0-0. [10.1016/j.tifs.2020.01.008]

Stone milling versus roller milling: A systematic review of the effects on wheat flour quality, dough rheology, and bread characteristics

alessio cappelli
;
noemi oliva;enrico cini
2020

Abstract

Abstract Background Grain milling might be the oldest manufacturing process in the world, and many techniques are currently used in the food industry. The two predominant methods used in wheat milling are stone milling and roller milling. The selected technique significantly influences flour quality, dough rheological properties, and bread characteristics. Choosing the most suitable method is essential; therefore, here we summarise the advantages and disadvantages of each technique and suggest specific improvement strategies. Scope and approach The first aim is to summarise current knowledge regarding the effects of stone milling and roller milling on wheat flour quality, dough rheology, and bread characteristics. The second aim is to propose specific strategies to improve the two techniques. Key Findings and Conclusions This review highlights the importance of selecting the most suitable technique. Stone milling has a few, clear advantages. These include: ease of use and the simplicity of the system; higher concentrations of macroelements, microelements, and polyphenols in flour; increased whole wheat bread volume; and popularity with consumers. Roller milling, on the other hand, also has advantages. These include: greater efficiency and flexibility; less heat generation; and better dough rheological performance. This review has not declared a “winner”, as both techniques have advantages and disadvantages. The optimal milling system is a function of the aim to be achieved, bearing in mind business needs and product demand.
2020
97
0
0
alessio cappelli, noemi oliva, enrico cini
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
review macinazione final version.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 493.39 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
493.39 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1182362
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 98
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 85
social impact