Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiographic endobiliary forceps biopsy versus endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration for proximal biliary strictures: a single-centre experience

Background Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiographic endobiliary forceps biopsy (PTC-EFB) are valid procedures for histological assessment of proximal biliary strictures (PBS), but their performances have never been compared. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of these two techniques. Method The diagnostic performances of EUS-FNA and PTC-EFB were compared in a retrospective cohort of patients assessed for PBS from 2011 to 2015 at a single tertiary centre. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed to adjust for covariate imbalance. Results A total of 102 EUS-FNAs and 75 PTC-EFBs (performed in 137 patients) were compared. Patients in the PTC-EFB group had higher preoperative bilirubin (243 versus 169 μmol/l, p = 0.005) and a higher incidence of malignancy (87% versus 67%, p = 0.008). Both techniques showed specificity and positive predictive value of 100%, and similar sensitivity (69% versus 75%, p = 0.45), negative predictive value (58% versus 38%, p = 0.15) and accuracy (78% versus 79%, p = 1.00). After IPTW, the diagnostic performance of the two techniques remained similar. Conclusion Compared to EUS-FNA, PTC-EFB provides similar sensitivity, negative predictive value and accuracy. It should therefore be considered as the preferred tissue-sampling procedure, if biliary drainage is indicated.