Background: Biolimus-eluting stents (BESs) with a biodegradable polymer in abluminal coating achieve more complete coverage at 9 months compared with sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) with a durable polymer, as assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Whether this advantage persists or augments after complete resorption of the polymer (>12 months) is unknown. Methods: The LEADERS trial compared the performance of BES with that of SES. Patients were randomly allocated to a sequential angiographic follow-up, including OCT in selected sites, at 9 and 24 months. Struts coverage was compared using Bayesian hierarchical models as the primary outcome for the OCT substudy. Results: Fifty-six patients (26 BES, 30 SES) were enrolled in the OCT substudy. Twenty-one patients (10 BES, 11 SES) agreed to perform a second OCT follow-up at 24 months. Eleven lesions and 12 stents were analyzed sequentially in the BES group (2,455 struts at 9 months, 2,131 struts at 24 months) and 11 lesions and 18 stents in the SES group (3,421 struts at 9 months, 4,170 struts at 24 months). The previously reported advantage of BES over SES in terms of better strut coverage at 9 months was followed by improvement in coverage of the SES, resulting in identical coverage in both BES and SES at 24 months: 1.5% versus 1.8% uncovered struts, difference -0.2%, 95% credibility interval, -3.2% to 2.6%, P =.84. Conclusions: More complete strut coverage of BES as compared with SES at 9 months was followed by improvement of coverage in SES between 9 and 24 months and a similar long-term coverage in both stent types at 24 months. © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Long-term tissue coverage of a biodegradable polylactide polymer-coated biolimus-eluting stent: Comparative sequential assessment with optical coherence tomography until complete resorption of the polymer / Gutierrez-Chico J.L.; Juni P.; Garcia-Garcia H.M.; Regar E.; Nuesch E.; Borgia F.; Van Der Giessen W.J.; Davies S.; Van Geuns R.J.; Secco G.G.; Meis S.; Windecker S.; Serruys P.W.; Di Mario C.. - In: AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL. - ISSN 0002-8703. - ELETTRONICO. - 162:(2011), pp. 922-931. [10.1016/j.ahj.2011.09.005]

Long-term tissue coverage of a biodegradable polylactide polymer-coated biolimus-eluting stent: Comparative sequential assessment with optical coherence tomography until complete resorption of the polymer

Di Mario C.
2011

Abstract

Background: Biolimus-eluting stents (BESs) with a biodegradable polymer in abluminal coating achieve more complete coverage at 9 months compared with sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) with a durable polymer, as assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Whether this advantage persists or augments after complete resorption of the polymer (>12 months) is unknown. Methods: The LEADERS trial compared the performance of BES with that of SES. Patients were randomly allocated to a sequential angiographic follow-up, including OCT in selected sites, at 9 and 24 months. Struts coverage was compared using Bayesian hierarchical models as the primary outcome for the OCT substudy. Results: Fifty-six patients (26 BES, 30 SES) were enrolled in the OCT substudy. Twenty-one patients (10 BES, 11 SES) agreed to perform a second OCT follow-up at 24 months. Eleven lesions and 12 stents were analyzed sequentially in the BES group (2,455 struts at 9 months, 2,131 struts at 24 months) and 11 lesions and 18 stents in the SES group (3,421 struts at 9 months, 4,170 struts at 24 months). The previously reported advantage of BES over SES in terms of better strut coverage at 9 months was followed by improvement in coverage of the SES, resulting in identical coverage in both BES and SES at 24 months: 1.5% versus 1.8% uncovered struts, difference -0.2%, 95% credibility interval, -3.2% to 2.6%, P =.84. Conclusions: More complete strut coverage of BES as compared with SES at 9 months was followed by improvement of coverage in SES between 9 and 24 months and a similar long-term coverage in both stent types at 24 months. © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
2011
162
922
931
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
Gutierrez-Chico J.L.; Juni P.; Garcia-Garcia H.M.; Regar E.; Nuesch E.; Borgia F.; Van Der Giessen W.J.; Davies S.; Van Geuns R.J.; Secco G.G.; Meis S.; Windecker S.; Serruys P.W.; Di Mario C.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0002870311006454-main.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 1.12 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.12 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1216704
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 50
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 43
social impact