The paper addresses the problem of distributed multi-target tracking (MTT) in a network of sensors having different fields of view (FoVs). Probability hypothesis density (PHD) filters are running locally in every sensor for MTT. The weighted arithmetic average (WAA) fusion rule is employed to fuse the multiple local PHD densities due to its computational efficiency. First, we provide a theoretical analysis showing that the standard WAA fusion among sensors with different FoVs is unsuitable from the perspective of the principle of minimum discrimination information (PMDI). In fact, the information inconsistency among sensors due to the different FoVs unavoidably leads to an underestimation of the fused PHD. Then, motivated by the analysis, we devise two novel approaches to address the different FoV issue. The first approach accounts for the case where the sensor FoVs are known and time-invariant. The second one deals with the more complicated case where the actual sensor FoVs can be cropped due to unknown line of sight obstructions or sensors can obtain the information outside their current FoVs because of platform movement or information feedback. The essence of the proposed approaches is to perform the WAA in a more robust way by employing a set of state-dependent fusion weights which are computed online. The Gaussian mixture implementations of the proposed methods are also presented. Various simulation experiments, including a challenging tracking scenario involving six sensors with different FoVs and also random line of sight obstructions, are designed to demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed fusion approaches.

Distributed Multi-Sensor Fusion of PHD Filters With Different Sensor Fields of View / Yi, W; Li, GC; Battistelli, G. - In: IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING. - ISSN 1053-587X. - ELETTRONICO. - 68:(2020), pp. 5204-5218. [10.1109/TSP.2020.3021834]

Distributed Multi-Sensor Fusion of PHD Filters With Different Sensor Fields of View

Battistelli, G
2020

Abstract

The paper addresses the problem of distributed multi-target tracking (MTT) in a network of sensors having different fields of view (FoVs). Probability hypothesis density (PHD) filters are running locally in every sensor for MTT. The weighted arithmetic average (WAA) fusion rule is employed to fuse the multiple local PHD densities due to its computational efficiency. First, we provide a theoretical analysis showing that the standard WAA fusion among sensors with different FoVs is unsuitable from the perspective of the principle of minimum discrimination information (PMDI). In fact, the information inconsistency among sensors due to the different FoVs unavoidably leads to an underestimation of the fused PHD. Then, motivated by the analysis, we devise two novel approaches to address the different FoV issue. The first approach accounts for the case where the sensor FoVs are known and time-invariant. The second one deals with the more complicated case where the actual sensor FoVs can be cropped due to unknown line of sight obstructions or sensors can obtain the information outside their current FoVs because of platform movement or information feedback. The essence of the proposed approaches is to perform the WAA in a more robust way by employing a set of state-dependent fusion weights which are computed online. The Gaussian mixture implementations of the proposed methods are also presented. Various simulation experiments, including a challenging tracking scenario involving six sensors with different FoVs and also random line of sight obstructions, are designed to demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed fusion approaches.
2020
68
5204
5218
Yi, W; Li, GC; Battistelli, G
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1218786
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 50
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 42
social impact