Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) critically influenced microscopically complete resection (R0) rates and long-term outcomes for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with portomesenteric vein resection (PVR) from a diverse, world-wide group of high-volume centers.Summary of Background Data: Limited size studies suggest that NAT improves R0 rates and overall survival compared to upfront surgery in R/BR-PDAC patients.Methods: This multicenter study analyzed consecutive patients with R/BR-PDAC who underwent PD with PVR in 23 high-volume centers from 2009 to 2018.Results: Data from 1192 patients with PD and PVR were collected and analyzed. The median age was 68 [interquartile range (IQR) 60-73] years and 52% were males. Some 186 (15.6%) and 131 (10.9%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) alone and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, respectively. The R0/R1/R2 rates were 57%, 39.3%, and 3.2% in patients who received NAT compared to 46.6%, 49.9%, and 3.5% in patients who did not, respectively (P =0.004). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS in patients receiving NAT was 79%, 41%, and 29%, while for those that did not it was 73%, 29%, and 18%, respectively (P <0.001). Multivariable analysis showed no administration of NAT, high tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, R1/R2 resection, no adjuvant chemotherapy, occurrence of Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher postoperative complications within 90 days, preoperative diabetes mellitus, male sex and portal vein involvement were negative independent predictive factors for OS.Conclusion: Patients with PDAC of the pancreatic head expected to undergo venous reconstruction should routinely be considered for NAT.

The Impact of Neoadjuvant Treatment on Survival in Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy With Concomitant Portomesenteric Venous Resection: An International Multicenter Analysis / Machairas N.; Raptis D.A.; Velazquez P.S.; Sauvanet A.; Rueda De Leon A.; Oba A.; Koerkamp B.G.; Lovasik B.; Chan C.; Yeo C.J.; Bassi C.; Ferrone C.R.; Kooby D.; Moskal D.; Tamburrino D.; Yoon D.-S.; Barroso E.; De Santibanes E.; Kauffmann E.F.; Vigia E.; Robin F.; Casciani F.; Burdio F.; Belfiori G.; Malleo G.; Lavu H.; Hartog H.; Hwang H.-K.; Han H.-S.; Marques H.P.; Poves I.; Dominguez-Rosado I.; Park J.-S.; Lillemoe K.D.; Roberts K.; Sulpice L.; Besselink M.G.; Abuawwad M.; Del Chiaro M.; De Santibanes M.; Falconi M.; D'Silva M.; Silva M.; Hilal M.A.; Qadan M.; Sell N.M.; Beghdadi N.; Napoli N.; Busch O.R.C.; Mazza O.; Muiesan P.; Muller P.C.; Ravikumar R.; Schulick R.; Powell-Brett S.; Abbas S.H.; Mackay T.M.; Stoop T.F.; Gallagher T.K.; Boggi U.; Van Eijck C.; Clavien P.-A.; Conlon K.C.P.; Fusai G.K.. - In: ANNALS OF SURGERY. - ISSN 0003-4932. - ELETTRONICO. - 274:(2021), pp. 721-728. [10.1097/SLA.0000000000005132]

The Impact of Neoadjuvant Treatment on Survival in Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy With Concomitant Portomesenteric Venous Resection: An International Multicenter Analysis

Muiesan P.;
2021

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) critically influenced microscopically complete resection (R0) rates and long-term outcomes for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with portomesenteric vein resection (PVR) from a diverse, world-wide group of high-volume centers.Summary of Background Data: Limited size studies suggest that NAT improves R0 rates and overall survival compared to upfront surgery in R/BR-PDAC patients.Methods: This multicenter study analyzed consecutive patients with R/BR-PDAC who underwent PD with PVR in 23 high-volume centers from 2009 to 2018.Results: Data from 1192 patients with PD and PVR were collected and analyzed. The median age was 68 [interquartile range (IQR) 60-73] years and 52% were males. Some 186 (15.6%) and 131 (10.9%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) alone and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, respectively. The R0/R1/R2 rates were 57%, 39.3%, and 3.2% in patients who received NAT compared to 46.6%, 49.9%, and 3.5% in patients who did not, respectively (P =0.004). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS in patients receiving NAT was 79%, 41%, and 29%, while for those that did not it was 73%, 29%, and 18%, respectively (P <0.001). Multivariable analysis showed no administration of NAT, high tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, R1/R2 resection, no adjuvant chemotherapy, occurrence of Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher postoperative complications within 90 days, preoperative diabetes mellitus, male sex and portal vein involvement were negative independent predictive factors for OS.Conclusion: Patients with PDAC of the pancreatic head expected to undergo venous reconstruction should routinely be considered for NAT.
2021
274
721
728
Goal 3: Good health and well-being for people
Machairas N.; Raptis D.A.; Velazquez P.S.; Sauvanet A.; Rueda De Leon A.; Oba A.; Koerkamp B.G.; Lovasik B.; Chan C.; Yeo C.J.; Bassi C.; Ferrone C.R.; Kooby D.; Moskal D.; Tamburrino D.; Yoon D.-S.; Barroso E.; De Santibanes E.; Kauffmann E.F.; Vigia E.; Robin F.; Casciani F.; Burdio F.; Belfiori G.; Malleo G.; Lavu H.; Hartog H.; Hwang H.-K.; Han H.-S.; Marques H.P.; Poves I.; Dominguez-Rosado I.; Park J.-S.; Lillemoe K.D.; Roberts K.; Sulpice L.; Besselink M.G.; Abuawwad M.; Del Chiaro M.; De Santibanes M.; Falconi M.; D'Silva M.; Silva M.; Hilal M.A.; Qadan M.; Sell N.M.; Beghdadi N.; Napoli N.; Busch O.R.C.; Mazza O.; Muiesan P.; Muller P.C.; Ravikumar R.; Schulick R.; Powell-Brett S.; Abbas S.H.; Mackay T.M.; Stoop T.F.; Gallagher T.K.; Boggi U.; Van Eijck C.; Clavien P.-A.; Conlon K.C.P.; Fusai G.K.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1258923
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 23
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 21
social impact