The identification of the coproporphyrin-dependent heme biosynthetic pathway, which is used almost exclusively by monoderm bacteria in 2015 by Dailey et al. triggered studies aimed at investigating the enzymes involved in this pathway that were originally assigned to the protoporphyrin-dependent heme biosynthetic pathway. Here, we revisit the active site of coproporphyrin ferrochelatase by a biophysical and biochemical investigation using the physiological substrate coproporphyrin III, which in contrast to the previously used substrate protoporphyrin IX has four propionate substituents and no vinyl groups. In particular, we have compared the reactivity of wild-type coproporphyrin ferrochelatase from the firmicute Listeria monocytogenes with those of variants, namely, His182Ala (H182A) and Glu263Gln (E263Q), involving two key active site residues. Interestingly, both variants are active only toward the physiological substrate coproporphyrin III but inactive toward protoporphyrin IX. In addition, E263 exchange impairs the final oxidation step from ferrous coproheme to ferric coproheme. The characteristics of the active site in the context of the residues involved and the substrate binding properties are discussed here using structural and functional means, providing a further contribution to the deciphering of this enigmatic reaction mechanism.In the context of the discovery of the coproporphyrin-dependent heme biosynthesis pathway, we have compared the reactivity of wild-type coproporphyrin ferrochelatase from the firmicute Listeria monocytogenes with those of variants, namely, H182A and E263Q, involving two key active site residues. Interestingly, both variants are active only toward the physiological substrate coproporphyrin III but inactive toward protoporphyrin IX. The obtained results raise important mechanistic questions. image
Revisiting catalytic His and Glu residues in coproporphyrin ferrochelatase – unexpected activities of active site variants / Gabler, Thomas; Dali, Andrea; Bellei, Marzia; Sebastiani, Federico; Becucci, Maurizio; Battistuzzi, Gianantonio; Furtmüller, Paul Georg; Smulevich, Giulietta; Hofbauer, Stefan. - In: THE FEBS JOURNAL. - ISSN 1742-464X. - ELETTRONICO. - (2024), pp. 0-0. [10.1111/febs.17101]
Revisiting catalytic His and Glu residues in coproporphyrin ferrochelatase – unexpected activities of active site variants
Dali, Andrea;Sebastiani, Federico;Becucci, Maurizio;Smulevich, Giulietta
;
2024
Abstract
The identification of the coproporphyrin-dependent heme biosynthetic pathway, which is used almost exclusively by monoderm bacteria in 2015 by Dailey et al. triggered studies aimed at investigating the enzymes involved in this pathway that were originally assigned to the protoporphyrin-dependent heme biosynthetic pathway. Here, we revisit the active site of coproporphyrin ferrochelatase by a biophysical and biochemical investigation using the physiological substrate coproporphyrin III, which in contrast to the previously used substrate protoporphyrin IX has four propionate substituents and no vinyl groups. In particular, we have compared the reactivity of wild-type coproporphyrin ferrochelatase from the firmicute Listeria monocytogenes with those of variants, namely, His182Ala (H182A) and Glu263Gln (E263Q), involving two key active site residues. Interestingly, both variants are active only toward the physiological substrate coproporphyrin III but inactive toward protoporphyrin IX. In addition, E263 exchange impairs the final oxidation step from ferrous coproheme to ferric coproheme. The characteristics of the active site in the context of the residues involved and the substrate binding properties are discussed here using structural and functional means, providing a further contribution to the deciphering of this enigmatic reaction mechanism.In the context of the discovery of the coproporphyrin-dependent heme biosynthesis pathway, we have compared the reactivity of wild-type coproporphyrin ferrochelatase from the firmicute Listeria monocytogenes with those of variants, namely, H182A and E263Q, involving two key active site residues. Interestingly, both variants are active only toward the physiological substrate coproporphyrin III but inactive toward protoporphyrin IX. The obtained results raise important mechanistic questions. imageI documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.