Background: We aimed to identify, among patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and Child-Pugh B cirrhosis, typically excluded from clinical trials, a subgroup that may benefit from first-line atezolizumab/bevacizumab (A/B). Methods: We conducted a retrospective international multicenter study including patients with unresectable HCC treated with first-line A/B between 2020 and 2024 across 12 centers. A cohort of Child-Pugh B patients treated with sorafenib served as a control. Baseline clinical, biological, and tumor features were correlated with radiological response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Among 1499 patients, 246 (16.4%) had Child-Pugh B cirrhosis. Within Child-Pugh B, 72% were B7, 21.5% B8, and 6.5% B9; 73% had ALBI grade 2 and 27% grade 3. Median OS and PFS were significantly shorter in Child-Pugh B (8.1 and 5.2 months) versus Child-Pugh A (16.8 and 8.6 months; both p<0.001). Two-year OS was 20% for Child-Pugh B versus 38% for Child-Pugh A. Child-Pugh B patients treated with A/B had longer OS than those treated with sorafenib (p=0.002). A score combining ALBI grade 1/2 and metastatic status identified prognostic subgroups (10.3 vs 7.9 vs 4.2 months; p<0.0001). Improvement to Child-Pugh A occurred in 31% and was associated with recent treatment of underlying liver disease. Radiological response (HR=0.58, p=0.021) and liver function improvement (HR=0.59, p=0.006) correlated with reduced mortality. Conclusion: Although Child-Pugh B patients have poorer survival, a subgroup, those with ALBI grade 1/2 and no extrahepatic metastasis, can derive meaningful benefit from A/B therapy. Improving underlying liver disease may contribute to better outcomes. Impacts and implications: Child-Pugh B patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma are systematically underrepresented in clinical trials, creating a critical evidence gap for a population frequently encountered in real-world practice. This large multicenter study shows that a subset of these patients, those with ALBI grade 1/2 and without extrahepatic metastases, can have clinically significant benefit from first-line atezolizumab/bevacizumab, providing a practical prognostic tool to guide patient selection. Moreover, the association between treatment of the underlying liver disease and Child-Pugh class improvement suggests that optimizing hepatic function alongside systemic therapy may represent an actionable strategy to improve outcomes, warranting prospective validation.
Clinical predictors of response to Atezolizumab-bevacizumab in Child-Pugh B patients with hepatocellular carcinoma / Odent, A.V., Campani, C., Bouattour, M., Touchefeu, Y., Delhoume, V., Rosmorduc, O., Pascale, A., An, J., Lee, H.C., Regnault, H., Thabut, D., Amaddeo, G., Ningararhi, M., Olivier-Hourmand, I., Metivier, C., Ronot, M., Ntandja-Wandji, L., Ozenne, V., Sidali, S., Marra, F., et al.. - In: JHEP REPORTS. - ISSN 2589-5559. - ELETTRONICO. - ??:(2026), pp. 101915.0-101915.0. [10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101915]
Clinical predictors of response to Atezolizumab-bevacizumab in Child-Pugh B patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
Campani, Claudia;Marra, Fabio;Nault, Jean-Charles
2026
Abstract
Background: We aimed to identify, among patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and Child-Pugh B cirrhosis, typically excluded from clinical trials, a subgroup that may benefit from first-line atezolizumab/bevacizumab (A/B). Methods: We conducted a retrospective international multicenter study including patients with unresectable HCC treated with first-line A/B between 2020 and 2024 across 12 centers. A cohort of Child-Pugh B patients treated with sorafenib served as a control. Baseline clinical, biological, and tumor features were correlated with radiological response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Among 1499 patients, 246 (16.4%) had Child-Pugh B cirrhosis. Within Child-Pugh B, 72% were B7, 21.5% B8, and 6.5% B9; 73% had ALBI grade 2 and 27% grade 3. Median OS and PFS were significantly shorter in Child-Pugh B (8.1 and 5.2 months) versus Child-Pugh A (16.8 and 8.6 months; both p<0.001). Two-year OS was 20% for Child-Pugh B versus 38% for Child-Pugh A. Child-Pugh B patients treated with A/B had longer OS than those treated with sorafenib (p=0.002). A score combining ALBI grade 1/2 and metastatic status identified prognostic subgroups (10.3 vs 7.9 vs 4.2 months; p<0.0001). Improvement to Child-Pugh A occurred in 31% and was associated with recent treatment of underlying liver disease. Radiological response (HR=0.58, p=0.021) and liver function improvement (HR=0.59, p=0.006) correlated with reduced mortality. Conclusion: Although Child-Pugh B patients have poorer survival, a subgroup, those with ALBI grade 1/2 and no extrahepatic metastasis, can derive meaningful benefit from A/B therapy. Improving underlying liver disease may contribute to better outcomes. Impacts and implications: Child-Pugh B patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma are systematically underrepresented in clinical trials, creating a critical evidence gap for a population frequently encountered in real-world practice. This large multicenter study shows that a subset of these patients, those with ALBI grade 1/2 and without extrahepatic metastases, can have clinically significant benefit from first-line atezolizumab/bevacizumab, providing a practical prognostic tool to guide patient selection. Moreover, the association between treatment of the underlying liver disease and Child-Pugh class improvement suggests that optimizing hepatic function alongside systemic therapy may represent an actionable strategy to improve outcomes, warranting prospective validation.I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



