This reply is intended to address the main concerns raised in the matters arising by Bottelin et al.1 to more clearly describe the use of fixed boundary conditions adopted in ref. 2, to underline limitations in the approach, and to discuss how alternative boundary conditions and block geometries might influence the system’s dynamics (see the Session “Numerical simulation limitations”).

Reply to: On the use of seismic noise studies for landslide rock block hazard assessment / Pazzi V., F.F.S.. - In: COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT. - ISSN 2662-4435. - ELETTRONICO. - 7:(2026), pp. 767.1-767.4. [10.1038/s43247-026-04028-3]

Reply to: On the use of seismic noise studies for landslide rock block hazard assessment

Pazzi V.
;
2026

Abstract

This reply is intended to address the main concerns raised in the matters arising by Bottelin et al.1 to more clearly describe the use of fixed boundary conditions adopted in ref. 2, to underline limitations in the approach, and to discuss how alternative boundary conditions and block geometries might influence the system’s dynamics (see the Session “Numerical simulation limitations”).
2026
7
1
4
Pazzi V., Fornasari F.S., Devoto S., Costa G., Forte E.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2026 Pazzi et al - CE&Ereply.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 1.13 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.13 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1489612
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact