This reply is intended to address the main concerns raised in the matters arising by Bottelin et al.1 to more clearly describe the use of fixed boundary conditions adopted in ref. 2, to underline limitations in the approach, and to discuss how alternative boundary conditions and block geometries might influence the system’s dynamics (see the Session “Numerical simulation limitations”).
Reply to: On the use of seismic noise studies for landslide rock block hazard assessment / Pazzi V., F.F.S.. - In: COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT. - ISSN 2662-4435. - ELETTRONICO. - 7:(2026), pp. 767.1-767.4. [10.1038/s43247-026-04028-3]
Reply to: On the use of seismic noise studies for landslide rock block hazard assessment
Pazzi V.
;
2026
Abstract
This reply is intended to address the main concerns raised in the matters arising by Bottelin et al.1 to more clearly describe the use of fixed boundary conditions adopted in ref. 2, to underline limitations in the approach, and to discuss how alternative boundary conditions and block geometries might influence the system’s dynamics (see the Session “Numerical simulation limitations”).| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2026 Pazzi et al - CE&Ereply.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Open Access
Dimensione
1.13 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.13 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



