The leadership and recognitions systems of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG) shape the profession’s culture, visibility, and future talent pipeline. Therefore, understanding participation among women members in these systems matters for SEG’s long-term vitality. Ten years have passed since the publication of “Women Geophysicists’ Contributions and Participation in SEG: Part 1” (The Leading Edge, Capello et al., 2015; https://doi.org/10.1190/ tle34060708.1), an article that examined gender diversity in SEG’s leadership, honors, and recognition systems. That 2015 analysis revealed a Society in transition but still marked by deep historical imbalances. This article revisits those questions with updated data and a broader lens. By comparing the 2015 baseline with current statistics, we document where progress has been made, which structural barriers persist, and how SEG might continue building a more inclusive and resilient community. A decade later, the picture is meaningfully different though not yet complete.

Women geophysicists’ contributions and participation in SEG — Part 2: A 10-year retrospective and outlook / Capello M.A., P., Santana T.. - In: THE LEADING EDGE. - ISSN 1070-485X. - ELETTRONICO. - 45:(2026), pp. 721-727. [10.1190/tle45100721]

Women geophysicists’ contributions and participation in SEG — Part 2: A 10-year retrospective and outlook

Pazzi V.;
2026

Abstract

The leadership and recognitions systems of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG) shape the profession’s culture, visibility, and future talent pipeline. Therefore, understanding participation among women members in these systems matters for SEG’s long-term vitality. Ten years have passed since the publication of “Women Geophysicists’ Contributions and Participation in SEG: Part 1” (The Leading Edge, Capello et al., 2015; https://doi.org/10.1190/ tle34060708.1), an article that examined gender diversity in SEG’s leadership, honors, and recognition systems. That 2015 analysis revealed a Society in transition but still marked by deep historical imbalances. This article revisits those questions with updated data and a broader lens. By comparing the 2015 baseline with current statistics, we document where progress has been made, which structural barriers persist, and how SEG might continue building a more inclusive and resilient community. A decade later, the picture is meaningfully different though not yet complete.
2026
45
721
727
Capello M.A., Pazzi, V., Zhang C., Klotzsche A.; Santana T.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2026 Capello et al - TLE.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 1.82 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.82 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1498936
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact