The aim of this paper is to clarify what is meant by the ‘’invention of complex numbers’’ by the Renaissance Italian algebraists Girolamo Cardano and Rafael Bombelli. The paper demonstrates that, despite the radix sophistica found in Cardano's Ars Magna that indicates the expressions a ±b√(-1), Cardano could not arithmetically operate with them, because he was not able to determine the sign of the square root of a negative number. Viceversa, Bombelli overcame this problem by inventing not “imaginary numbers”, but rather the new signs “plus of minus” (più di meno) and “minus of minus” (meno di meno) and their rules of composition. The radices sophisticae of Cardano and Bombelli were thus entities able to give meaning to Tartaglia's solution formula for a cubic equation in the irreducible case, just as the racines imaginaires of Albert Girard and René Descartes gave meaning to the first (weak) formulations of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra. Ultimately, I show that in the late Renaissance the radice sophisticae or racines imaginaires were something quite different from the modern “complex numbers”, essentially because they appeared only as a useful tool to solve problems, and not yet as a true mathematical object to be studied.

Radices sophisticae, racines imaginaires: the Origin of Complex Numbers in the Late Renaissance / Veronica Gavagna. - STAMPA. - XII:(2014), pp. 165-190. [10.1007/978-3-319-02111-9_7]

Radices sophisticae, racines imaginaires: the Origin of Complex Numbers in the Late Renaissance

GAVAGNA, VERONICA
2014

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to clarify what is meant by the ‘’invention of complex numbers’’ by the Renaissance Italian algebraists Girolamo Cardano and Rafael Bombelli. The paper demonstrates that, despite the radix sophistica found in Cardano's Ars Magna that indicates the expressions a ±b√(-1), Cardano could not arithmetically operate with them, because he was not able to determine the sign of the square root of a negative number. Viceversa, Bombelli overcame this problem by inventing not “imaginary numbers”, but rather the new signs “plus of minus” (più di meno) and “minus of minus” (meno di meno) and their rules of composition. The radices sophisticae of Cardano and Bombelli were thus entities able to give meaning to Tartaglia's solution formula for a cubic equation in the irreducible case, just as the racines imaginaires of Albert Girard and René Descartes gave meaning to the first (weak) formulations of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra. Ultimately, I show that in the late Renaissance the radice sophisticae or racines imaginaires were something quite different from the modern “complex numbers”, essentially because they appeared only as a useful tool to solve problems, and not yet as a true mathematical object to be studied.
2014
9783319021102
The Art of Science. From Perspective Drawing to Quantum Randomness
165
190
Goal 17: Partnerships for the goals
Veronica Gavagna
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2014_Gavagna_Springer.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 430.46 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
430.46 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1037040
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact