pain. The aim of the present study was to test the clinimetric properties of the MPQ. Methods: A sample of 200 migraine outpatients were enrolled; homogeneity of MPQ was assessed by Mokken Analysis; item-level severity and item-level sensitivity were calculated via Two-Parameter Logistic model; Total Information Function was evaluated to assess reliability of MPQ; internal consistency was calculated via Cronbach's alpha and Sijtsma and Molenaar rho; sensitivity and specificity were assessed via Receiver Operating Characteristic curves. Results: The MPQ showed unidimensional factor structure; satisfactory homogeneity of the item and total score, except items 4 (“my pain is everywhere”) and 6 (“I cannot understand why I feel this pain”); good discrimination, except item 7 (“I feel empty”); low information provided by items 4, 6, 7; good reliability for mild and high levels of mental pain; poor reliability for low levels of mental pain; acceptable internal consistency; acceptable sensitivity and specificity. Limitations: The sample size is barely sufficient to calculate item parameters; it is a monocentric study that enrolled outpatients from a tertiary facility; the study enrolled migraine outpatients not affected by other medical disease. Conclusions: The MPQ showed good psychometric properties. Items 4, 6, 7 should be considered with caution when migraine patients are evaluated. A score of at least 3 indicates mental pain clinically relevant, a score of at least 2 indicates distress. These data are preliminary and refer to migraine patients, results might be different in psychiatric populations.
Mental Pain Questionnaire: An item response theory analysis / Svicher, A.; Romanazzo, S.; De Cesaris, F.; Benemei, S.; Geppetti, P.; Cosci, F.. - In: JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS. - ISSN 0165-0327. - ELETTRONICO. - 249:(2019), pp. 226-233. [10.1016/j.jad.2019.02.030]
Mental Pain Questionnaire: An item response theory analysis
Svicher, A.;ROMANAZZO, SARA;De Cesaris, F.;Benemei, S.;Geppetti, P.;Cosci, F.
2019
Abstract
pain. The aim of the present study was to test the clinimetric properties of the MPQ. Methods: A sample of 200 migraine outpatients were enrolled; homogeneity of MPQ was assessed by Mokken Analysis; item-level severity and item-level sensitivity were calculated via Two-Parameter Logistic model; Total Information Function was evaluated to assess reliability of MPQ; internal consistency was calculated via Cronbach's alpha and Sijtsma and Molenaar rho; sensitivity and specificity were assessed via Receiver Operating Characteristic curves. Results: The MPQ showed unidimensional factor structure; satisfactory homogeneity of the item and total score, except items 4 (“my pain is everywhere”) and 6 (“I cannot understand why I feel this pain”); good discrimination, except item 7 (“I feel empty”); low information provided by items 4, 6, 7; good reliability for mild and high levels of mental pain; poor reliability for low levels of mental pain; acceptable internal consistency; acceptable sensitivity and specificity. Limitations: The sample size is barely sufficient to calculate item parameters; it is a monocentric study that enrolled outpatients from a tertiary facility; the study enrolled migraine outpatients not affected by other medical disease. Conclusions: The MPQ showed good psychometric properties. Items 4, 6, 7 should be considered with caution when migraine patients are evaluated. A score of at least 3 indicates mental pain clinically relevant, a score of at least 2 indicates distress. These data are preliminary and refer to migraine patients, results might be different in psychiatric populations.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Svicher et al 2019_MPQ_JAD.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Descrizione: paper
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
427.49 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
427.49 kB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.