Some points for reflection on studies about religions and the environment

The Lynn Withe’s theses about links between religion and environment in the Middle Ages were innovative and set a standard, particularly in demonstrating how official Christianity contributed to the development of a society prone to environmental exploitation. Around the same time as White’s writings on environmental issues from the historical perspective of religions and human attitudes toward the environment, ecofeminism emerged. This cultural movement aimed at overcoming the androcentric and patriarchal worldview, offering not only theoretical insights but also laying the theoretical foundations for societal action. Ecofeminist interpretations often present a radical critique of the capitalist system, suggesting that the historical link between the market economy and the scientific revolution has strengthened the theoretical foundations of the marginalization of women. Ecofeminism has not confined itself to theoretical discussions but has generated innovative and engaging experiences. While drawing insights from historical interpretations of the relationship between religions and the environment, it is essential to critically evaluate whether these interpretations are applicable universally across diverse social and historical contexts. The practice of ranking religions based on their perceived ecological stance may oversimplify complex relationships. Constructing hierarchies among religions might not contribute to a nuanced understanding but rather fuel divisive thinking. Recognizing that environmental issues are fundamentally contemporary, it’s crucial to acknowledge that the environmental question as we know it today did not exist in previous eras.