The chapter examines how far-right media negotiate the relationship between climate denial, environmental discourse, and competing visions of nature and progress through conspiratorial framing strategies. Focusing on a comparative analysis of two far-right alternative media outlets—Il Primato Nazionale (Italy) and COMPACT-Magazin (Germany)—it explores how conspiracy narratives shape understandings of climate change, modernity, and societal transformation. Drawing on scholarship on conspiracism and far-right environmental communication, the paper investigates whether conspiracy theories primarily serve to deny climate change or rather to delegitimise environmentalism as a political and cultural project. Particular attention is paid to the discursive construction of “nature,” which is alternately represented as a self-regulating order and as a victim of environmental policies perceived as threatening sovereignty and economic development.Methodologically, the study combines frame analysis with the identification of recurring topoi within the Discourse-Historical Approach. The empirical material consists of print special issues and online articles published between 2019 and 2025.
Manufactured Emergencies and Metapolitical Struggles in Far-Right Alternative Media: Climate Conspiracism in “Il Primato Nazionale” and “Compact-Magazin / Giorgia Bulli. - STAMPA. - (In corso di stampa), pp. 0-0.
Manufactured Emergencies and Metapolitical Struggles in Far-Right Alternative Media: Climate Conspiracism in “Il Primato Nazionale” and “Compact-Magazin
Giorgia Bulli
In corso di stampa
Abstract
The chapter examines how far-right media negotiate the relationship between climate denial, environmental discourse, and competing visions of nature and progress through conspiratorial framing strategies. Focusing on a comparative analysis of two far-right alternative media outlets—Il Primato Nazionale (Italy) and COMPACT-Magazin (Germany)—it explores how conspiracy narratives shape understandings of climate change, modernity, and societal transformation. Drawing on scholarship on conspiracism and far-right environmental communication, the paper investigates whether conspiracy theories primarily serve to deny climate change or rather to delegitimise environmentalism as a political and cultural project. Particular attention is paid to the discursive construction of “nature,” which is alternately represented as a self-regulating order and as a victim of environmental policies perceived as threatening sovereignty and economic development.Methodologically, the study combines frame analysis with the identification of recurring topoi within the Discourse-Historical Approach. The empirical material consists of print special issues and online articles published between 2019 and 2025.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
editorial_proof_2026_Bulli_climate_conspiracy_compact_PN.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
798.29 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
798.29 kB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



