The chapter examines how far-right media negotiate the relationship between climate denial, environmental discourse, and competing visions of nature and progress through conspiratorial framing strategies. Focusing on a comparative analysis of two far-right alternative media outlets—Il Primato Nazionale (Italy) and COMPACT-Magazin (Germany)—it explores how conspiracy narratives shape understandings of climate change, modernity, and societal transformation. Drawing on scholarship on conspiracism and far-right environmental communication, the paper investigates whether conspiracy theories primarily serve to deny climate change or rather to delegitimise environmentalism as a political and cultural project. Particular attention is paid to the discursive construction of “nature,” which is alternately represented as a self-regulating order and as a victim of environmental policies perceived as threatening sovereignty and economic development.Methodologically, the study combines frame analysis with the identification of recurring topoi within the Discourse-Historical Approach. The empirical material consists of print special issues and online articles published between 2019 and 2025.

Manufactured Emergencies and Metapolitical Struggles in Far-Right Alternative Media: Climate Conspiracism in “Il Primato Nazionale” and “Compact-Magazin / Giorgia Bulli. - STAMPA. - (In corso di stampa), pp. 0-0.

Manufactured Emergencies and Metapolitical Struggles in Far-Right Alternative Media: Climate Conspiracism in “Il Primato Nazionale” and “Compact-Magazin

Giorgia Bulli
In corso di stampa

Abstract

The chapter examines how far-right media negotiate the relationship between climate denial, environmental discourse, and competing visions of nature and progress through conspiratorial framing strategies. Focusing on a comparative analysis of two far-right alternative media outlets—Il Primato Nazionale (Italy) and COMPACT-Magazin (Germany)—it explores how conspiracy narratives shape understandings of climate change, modernity, and societal transformation. Drawing on scholarship on conspiracism and far-right environmental communication, the paper investigates whether conspiracy theories primarily serve to deny climate change or rather to delegitimise environmentalism as a political and cultural project. Particular attention is paid to the discursive construction of “nature,” which is alternately represented as a self-regulating order and as a victim of environmental policies perceived as threatening sovereignty and economic development.Methodologically, the study combines frame analysis with the identification of recurring topoi within the Discourse-Historical Approach. The empirical material consists of print special issues and online articles published between 2019 and 2025.
In corso di stampa
978-3-032-13932-0
Conspiracism and Political Conflict
0
0
Giorgia Bulli
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
editorial_proof_2026_Bulli_climate_conspiracy_compact_PN.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 798.29 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
798.29 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1473775
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact