BACKGROUND: Each region of the world has its own methods, protocols, instruments and procedures regarding how to brew coffee. The final result in the cup is strongly affected by the extractionmethod, andmany studies have focused on this subject. However, few studies have investigated slow, cold extractionmethods, despite their popularity among baristas. Therefore, the present study aimed to characterize and compare two cold extractionmethods: cold brew and cold drip. RESULTS: Physical and chemical analyses were used to describe coffee beverages in terms of pH, total solids, refractive index, density andviscosity.Caffeine andcinnamic acidswerequantified usinghigh-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)/diode array detector and HPLC/mass spectrometry. A sensory evaluation included aroma, flavor and textural attributes. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences were found in the chemical and physical parameters, both between and within the two methods, as a function of the extraction temperature and contact time. Similarly, the sensory evaluation found differences in flavor profiles, asmeasured in terms of bitterness, sweetness, sourness and global intensity. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry
Characterization and comparison of cold brew and cold drip coffee extraction methods / Angeloni, Giulia*; Guerrini, Lorenzo; Masella, Piernicola; Innocenti, Marzia; Bellumori, Maria; Parenti, Alessandro. - In: JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE. - ISSN 0022-5142. - ELETTRONICO. - 99:(2019), pp. 391-399. [10.1002/jsfa.9200]
Characterization and comparison of cold brew and cold drip coffee extraction methods
ANGELONI, GIULIA
;Guerrini, Lorenzo;Masella, Piernicola;Innocenti, Marzia;Bellumori, Maria;Parenti, Alessandro
2019
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Each region of the world has its own methods, protocols, instruments and procedures regarding how to brew coffee. The final result in the cup is strongly affected by the extractionmethod, andmany studies have focused on this subject. However, few studies have investigated slow, cold extractionmethods, despite their popularity among baristas. Therefore, the present study aimed to characterize and compare two cold extractionmethods: cold brew and cold drip. RESULTS: Physical and chemical analyses were used to describe coffee beverages in terms of pH, total solids, refractive index, density andviscosity.Caffeine andcinnamic acidswerequantified usinghigh-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)/diode array detector and HPLC/mass spectrometry. A sensory evaluation included aroma, flavor and textural attributes. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences were found in the chemical and physical parameters, both between and within the two methods, as a function of the extraction temperature and contact time. Similarly, the sensory evaluation found differences in flavor profiles, asmeasured in terms of bitterness, sweetness, sourness and global intensity. © 2018 Society of Chemical IndustryFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Angeloni_et_al-2018 Characterization and comparison of cold brew and cold drip.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
359.03 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
359.03 kB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.