In a preregistered, cross-sectional study, we investigated whether olfactory loss is a reliable predictor of COVID-19 using a crowdsourced questionnaire in 23 languages to assess symptoms in individuals self-reporting recent respiratory illness. We quantified changes in chemosensory abilities during the course of the respiratory illness using 0–100 visual analog scales (VAS) for participants reporting a positive (C19+; n = 4148) or negative (C19−; n = 546) COVID-19 laboratory test outcome. Logistic regression models identified univariate and multivariate predictors of COVID-19 status and post-COVID-19 olfactory recovery. Both C19+ and C19− groups exhibited smell loss, but it was significantly larger in C19+ participants (mean ± SD, C19+: −82.5 ± 27.2 points; C19−: −59.8 ± 37.7). Smell loss during illness was the best predictor of COVID-19 in both univariate and multivariate models (ROC AUC = 0.72). Additional variables provide negligible model improvement. VAS ratings of smell loss were more predictive than binary chemosensory yes/no-questions or other cardinal symptoms (e.g., fever). Olfactory recovery within 40 days of respiratory symptom onset was reported for ~50% of participants and was best predicted by time since respiratory symptom onset. We find that quantified smell loss is the best predictor of COVID-19 amongst those with symptoms of respiratory illness. To aid clinicians and contact tracers in identifying individuals with a high likelihood of having COVID-19, we propose a novel 0–10 scale to screen for recent olfactory loss, the ODoR-19. We find that numeric ratings ≤2 indicate high odds of symptomatic COVID-19 (4 < OR < 10). Once independently validated, this tool could be deployed when viral lab tests are impractical or unavailable.

Recent smell loss is the best predictor of COVID-19 among individuals with recent respiratory symptoms / Gerkin R.C.; Ohla K.; Veldhuizen M.G.; Joseph P.V.; Kelly C.E.; Bakke A.J.; Steele K.E.; Farruggia M.C.; Pellegrino R.; Pepino M.Y.; Bouysset C.; Soler G.M.; Pereda-Loth V.; Dibattista M.; Cooper K.W.; Croijmans I.; Di Pizio A.; Ozdener M.H.; Fjaeldstad A.W.; Lin C.; Sandell M.A.; Singh P.B.; Brindha V.E.; Olsson S.B.; Saraiva L.R.; Ahuja G.; Alwashahi M.K.; Bhutani S.; D'Errico A.; Fornazieri M.A.; Golebiowski J.; Hwang L.D.; Ozturk L.; Roura E.; Spinelli S.; Whitcroft K.L.; Faraji F.; Fischmeister F.Ph.S.; Heinbockel T.; Hsieh J.W.; Huart C.; Konstantinidis I.; Menini A.; Morini G.; Olofsson J.K.; Philpott C.M.; Pierron D.; Shields V.D.C.; Voznessenskaya V.V.; Albayay J.; Altundag A.; Bensafi M.; Bock M.A.; Calcinoni O.; Fredborg W.; Laudamiel C.; Lim J.; Lundstrom J.N.; Macchi A.; Meyer P.; Moein S.T.; Santamaria E.; Sengupta D.; Dominguez P.R.; Yanik H.; Hummel T.; Hayes J.E.; Reed D.R.; Niv M.Y.; Munger S.D.; Parma V.; Boesveldt S.; de Groot J.H.B.; Dinnella C.; Freiherr J.; Laktionova T.; Marino S.; Monteleone E.; Nunez-Parra A.; Abdulrahman O.; Ritchie M.; Thomas-Danguin T.; Walsh-Messinger J.; Abri R.A.; Alizadeh R.; Bignon E.; Cantone E.; Cecchini M.P.; Chen J.; Guardia M.D.; Hoover K.C.; Karni N.; Navarro M.; Nolden A.A.; Mazal P.P.; Rowan N.R.; Sarabi-Jamab A.; Archer N.S.; Chen B.; Di Valerio E.A.; Feeney E.L.; Frasnelli J.; Hannum M.E.; Hopkins C.; Klein H.; Mignot C.; Mucignat C.; Ning Y.; Ozturk E.E.; Peng M.; Saatci O.; Sell E.A.; Yan C.H.; Alfaro R.; Cecchetto C.; Coureaud G.; Herriman R.D.; Justice J.M.; Kaushik P.K.; Koyama S.; Overdevest J.B.; Pirastu N.; Ramirez V.A.; Roberts S.C.; Smith B.C.; Cao H.; Wang H.; Birindwa P.B.; Baguma M.. - In: CHEMICAL SENSES. - ISSN 0379-864X. - ELETTRONICO. - 46:(2021), pp. 0-0. [10.1093/chemse/bjaa081]

Recent smell loss is the best predictor of COVID-19 among individuals with recent respiratory symptoms

Spinelli S.;Dinnella C.;Monteleone E.;
2021

Abstract

In a preregistered, cross-sectional study, we investigated whether olfactory loss is a reliable predictor of COVID-19 using a crowdsourced questionnaire in 23 languages to assess symptoms in individuals self-reporting recent respiratory illness. We quantified changes in chemosensory abilities during the course of the respiratory illness using 0–100 visual analog scales (VAS) for participants reporting a positive (C19+; n = 4148) or negative (C19−; n = 546) COVID-19 laboratory test outcome. Logistic regression models identified univariate and multivariate predictors of COVID-19 status and post-COVID-19 olfactory recovery. Both C19+ and C19− groups exhibited smell loss, but it was significantly larger in C19+ participants (mean ± SD, C19+: −82.5 ± 27.2 points; C19−: −59.8 ± 37.7). Smell loss during illness was the best predictor of COVID-19 in both univariate and multivariate models (ROC AUC = 0.72). Additional variables provide negligible model improvement. VAS ratings of smell loss were more predictive than binary chemosensory yes/no-questions or other cardinal symptoms (e.g., fever). Olfactory recovery within 40 days of respiratory symptom onset was reported for ~50% of participants and was best predicted by time since respiratory symptom onset. We find that quantified smell loss is the best predictor of COVID-19 amongst those with symptoms of respiratory illness. To aid clinicians and contact tracers in identifying individuals with a high likelihood of having COVID-19, we propose a novel 0–10 scale to screen for recent olfactory loss, the ODoR-19. We find that numeric ratings ≤2 indicate high odds of symptomatic COVID-19 (4 < OR < 10). Once independently validated, this tool could be deployed when viral lab tests are impractical or unavailable.
2021
46
0
0
Goal 3: Good health and well-being for people
Gerkin R.C.; Ohla K.; Veldhuizen M.G.; Joseph P.V.; Kelly C.E.; Bakke A.J.; Steele K.E.; Farruggia M.C.; Pellegrino R.; Pepino M.Y.; Bouysset C.; Soler G.M.; Pereda-Loth V.; Dibattista M.; Cooper K.W.; Croijmans I.; Di Pizio A.; Ozdener M.H.; Fjaeldstad A.W.; Lin C.; Sandell M.A.; Singh P.B.; Brindha V.E.; Olsson S.B.; Saraiva L.R.; Ahuja G.; Alwashahi M.K.; Bhutani S.; D'Errico A.; Fornazieri M.A.; Golebiowski J.; Hwang L.D.; Ozturk L.; Roura E.; Spinelli S.; Whitcroft K.L.; Faraji F.; Fischmeister F.Ph.S.; Heinbockel T.; Hsieh J.W.; Huart C.; Konstantinidis I.; Menini A.; Morini G.; Olofsson J.K.; Philpott C.M.; Pierron D.; Shields V.D.C.; Voznessenskaya V.V.; Albayay J.; Altundag A.; Bensafi M.; Bock M.A.; Calcinoni O.; Fredborg W.; Laudamiel C.; Lim J.; Lundstrom J.N.; Macchi A.; Meyer P.; Moein S.T.; Santamaria E.; Sengupta D.; Dominguez P.R.; Yanik H.; Hummel T.; Hayes J.E.; Reed D.R.; Niv M.Y.; Munger S.D.; Parma V.; Boesveldt S.; de Groot J.H.B.; Dinnella C.; Freiherr J.; Laktionova T.; Marino S.; Monteleone E.; Nunez-Parra A.; Abdulrahman O.; Ritchie M.; Thomas-Danguin T.; Walsh-Messinger J.; Abri R.A.; Alizadeh R.; Bignon E.; Cantone E.; Cecchini M.P.; Chen J.; Guardia M.D.; Hoover K.C.; Karni N.; Navarro M.; Nolden A.A.; Mazal P.P.; Rowan N.R.; Sarabi-Jamab A.; Archer N.S.; Chen B.; Di Valerio E.A.; Feeney E.L.; Frasnelli J.; Hannum M.E.; Hopkins C.; Klein H.; Mignot C.; Mucignat C.; Ning Y.; Ozturk E.E.; Peng M.; Saatci O.; Sell E.A.; Yan C.H.; Alfaro R.; Cecchetto C.; Coureaud G.; Herriman R.D.; Justice J.M.; Kaushik P.K.; Koyama S.; Overdevest J.B.; Pirastu N.; Ramirez V.A.; Roberts S.C.; Smith B.C.; Cao H.; Wang H.; Birindwa P.B.; Baguma M.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
bjaa081.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 1.03 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.03 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1232653
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 103
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact