Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is transforming higher edu-cation, shifting the paradigm from simple tool usage to human-AI co-creation of educational content. While this evolution offers potential for developing person-alized and scalable Open Educational Resources (OER), it introduces systemic risks challenging academic integrity, equity, and Open Science principles. This paper problematizes three critical limitations of GenAI—hallucinations, hege-monic bias, and proprietary opacity—and proposes a mitigation framework built on three pillars: technical grounding through Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), critical human oversight via Human-in-the-Loop (HITL), and commit-ment to openness. We present a case study from the University of Florence’s participation in the PNRR-funded ALMA project, where a pilot study (January– July 2025) involving 10 faculty members developed an innovative workflow for educational video production using GenAI tools. The workflow achieved an 83% reduction in production time while maintaining academic rigor through embed-ded expert review. Our analysis demonstrates that a deliberate, human-centered approach can effectively manage GenAI risks, enabling responsible AI adoption within national digitalization initiatives.
A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for AI-Assisted MOOC Production: Managing GenAI Risks in Educational Content Production / Biagini, G.. - ELETTRONICO. - 2959:(2027), pp. 414-424. (HELMeTO 2025 Napoli 23-25 September 2025) [10.1007/978-3-032-31853-4_27].
A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for AI-Assisted MOOC Production: Managing GenAI Risks in Educational Content Production
Biagini G.;Pezzati F.;Spinu M. B.;Ranieri M.
2027
Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is transforming higher edu-cation, shifting the paradigm from simple tool usage to human-AI co-creation of educational content. While this evolution offers potential for developing person-alized and scalable Open Educational Resources (OER), it introduces systemic risks challenging academic integrity, equity, and Open Science principles. This paper problematizes three critical limitations of GenAI—hallucinations, hege-monic bias, and proprietary opacity—and proposes a mitigation framework built on three pillars: technical grounding through Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), critical human oversight via Human-in-the-Loop (HITL), and commit-ment to openness. We present a case study from the University of Florence’s participation in the PNRR-funded ALMA project, where a pilot study (January– July 2025) involving 10 faculty members developed an innovative workflow for educational video production using GenAI tools. The workflow achieved an 83% reduction in production time while maintaining academic rigor through embed-ded expert review. Our analysis demonstrates that a deliberate, human-centered approach can effectively manage GenAI risks, enabling responsible AI adoption within national digitalization initiatives.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
978-3-032-31853-4.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
32.99 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
32.99 MB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia all'autore |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



