Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is transforming higher edu-cation, shifting the paradigm from simple tool usage to human-AI co-creation of educational content. While this evolution offers potential for developing person-alized and scalable Open Educational Resources (OER), it introduces systemic risks challenging academic integrity, equity, and Open Science principles. This paper problematizes three critical limitations of GenAI—hallucinations, hege-monic bias, and proprietary opacity—and proposes a mitigation framework built on three pillars: technical grounding through Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), critical human oversight via Human-in-the-Loop (HITL), and commit-ment to openness. We present a case study from the University of Florence’s participation in the PNRR-funded ALMA project, where a pilot study (January– July 2025) involving 10 faculty members developed an innovative workflow for educational video production using GenAI tools. The workflow achieved an 83% reduction in production time while maintaining academic rigor through embed-ded expert review. Our analysis demonstrates that a deliberate, human-centered approach can effectively manage GenAI risks, enabling responsible AI adoption within national digitalization initiatives.

A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for AI-Assisted MOOC Production: Managing GenAI Risks in Educational Content Production / Biagini, G.. - ELETTRONICO. - 2959:(2027), pp. 414-424. (HELMeTO 2025 Napoli 23-25 September 2025) [10.1007/978-3-032-31853-4_27].

A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for AI-Assisted MOOC Production: Managing GenAI Risks in Educational Content Production

Biagini G.;Pezzati F.;Spinu M. B.;Ranieri M.
2027

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is transforming higher edu-cation, shifting the paradigm from simple tool usage to human-AI co-creation of educational content. While this evolution offers potential for developing person-alized and scalable Open Educational Resources (OER), it introduces systemic risks challenging academic integrity, equity, and Open Science principles. This paper problematizes three critical limitations of GenAI—hallucinations, hege-monic bias, and proprietary opacity—and proposes a mitigation framework built on three pillars: technical grounding through Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), critical human oversight via Human-in-the-Loop (HITL), and commit-ment to openness. We present a case study from the University of Florence’s participation in the PNRR-funded ALMA project, where a pilot study (January– July 2025) involving 10 faculty members developed an innovative workflow for educational video production using GenAI tools. The workflow achieved an 83% reduction in production time while maintaining academic rigor through embed-ded expert review. Our analysis demonstrates that a deliberate, human-centered approach can effectively manage GenAI risks, enabling responsible AI adoption within national digitalization initiatives.
2027
Higher Education Learning Methodologies and Technologies Online. HELMeTO 2025. Communications in Computer and Information Science
HELMeTO 2025
Napoli
23-25 September 2025
Biagini, G., Pezzati, F., Spinu, M.B., Ranieri, M.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
978-3-032-31853-4.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 32.99 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
32.99 MB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia all'autore

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1492336
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact